Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On Grognardism...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8248484" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I feel like that article is a bit weird given that I started playing in 1989, and my main group all the way back has basically been what he calls "Neo-trad" and claims came out of 3E organised play. It's like, I'm pretty sure that fun-centric model which makes the players more important than the "trad" model he describes has existed since at least the late '80s, because I was taught to play that way by an older cousin in 1989, and she didn't seem to indicate it was novel. Also a lot of RPG material from the early '90s seemed to support that general approach.</p><p></p><p>I mean, I definitely recognise Trad vs. what they're calling OC/Neo-trad, it was a conflict back in the 1990s, but it largely seemed to be an age-based division, like if someone was older than me, they were increasingly likely to be trad, and younger, increasingly likely to be neo-trad. I've almost never come across anyone playing something that genuinely matches his definition of Classic and I'm not sure I entirely buy his separation of OSR and Classic - I mean I get the point he's trying to make, but some of the stuff he's attributing to OSR is certainly how people represented the games they ran/played in the 1990s. I'm not sure "Story Games" is really a separate thing either, I think it's closely related to Neo-trad. Nordic Larp I can't really comment on.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, the most interesting thing I found out about from that article was Warlock/CalTech-style D&D, which I had only a vague idea even existed, and then I looked into and which gave Thieves codified abilities all the way back in 1976, and frankly, their design of Thieves appears to have been more advanced than anything we saw from official D&D all the way until 4E with 2008, 32 years later (arguably 3E but it seems closer to the 4E/5E approach)! They also apparently had codified abilities for Fighters and so on. And a spell-point system for magic. Talk about ahead of their time! Unfortunately a lot of it wasn't very well-recorded.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8248484, member: 18"] I feel like that article is a bit weird given that I started playing in 1989, and my main group all the way back has basically been what he calls "Neo-trad" and claims came out of 3E organised play. It's like, I'm pretty sure that fun-centric model which makes the players more important than the "trad" model he describes has existed since at least the late '80s, because I was taught to play that way by an older cousin in 1989, and she didn't seem to indicate it was novel. Also a lot of RPG material from the early '90s seemed to support that general approach. I mean, I definitely recognise Trad vs. what they're calling OC/Neo-trad, it was a conflict back in the 1990s, but it largely seemed to be an age-based division, like if someone was older than me, they were increasingly likely to be trad, and younger, increasingly likely to be neo-trad. I've almost never come across anyone playing something that genuinely matches his definition of Classic and I'm not sure I entirely buy his separation of OSR and Classic - I mean I get the point he's trying to make, but some of the stuff he's attributing to OSR is certainly how people represented the games they ran/played in the 1990s. I'm not sure "Story Games" is really a separate thing either, I think it's closely related to Neo-trad. Nordic Larp I can't really comment on. As an aside, the most interesting thing I found out about from that article was Warlock/CalTech-style D&D, which I had only a vague idea even existed, and then I looked into and which gave Thieves codified abilities all the way back in 1976, and frankly, their design of Thieves appears to have been more advanced than anything we saw from official D&D all the way until 4E with 2008, 32 years later (arguably 3E but it seems closer to the 4E/5E approach)! They also apparently had codified abilities for Fighters and so on. And a spell-point system for magic. Talk about ahead of their time! Unfortunately a lot of it wasn't very well-recorded. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On Grognardism...
Top