Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On Grognardism...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 8396224" data-attributes="member: 15700"><p>Again...</p><p></p><p></p><p>You made the claim that WoTC is pushing RAW, when back in the day all those rules were optional in 1e. And 1e was great because of all that "white space." That was the core argument you were making in several posts. Let's break this down:</p><p></p><p>White space claim: Not true. There were <em>more </em>rules in 1e DMG than in 5e. Heck, the 1e DMG has over 300,000 words compared to 5e's 80,000. That doesn't mean there are more than 3x as many rules because you can't compare word for word, but it is a pretty good indicator, especially when you look at the actual content of those books, that 1e had significantly more rules for things. This isn't my opinion or your opinion. These are things we can verify by looking at the books.</p><p></p><p>That alone makes your claim dubious. But where it really goes off the rails is when you claim that all those rules in 1e are optional based on that one line despite<em> 2</em> pages of warning against changing the rules right before it, but <em>don't</em> consider 5e rules optional when it says the same thing about being optional and <em>doesn't </em>have 2 pages of warnings telling you to adhere to the rules or it's dangerous.</p><p></p><p>Is that clear enough?</p><p></p><p>So I stand by my original post. You went on a diatribe against modern editions using false assumptions and speculation, showing a lack of understanding about both 1e and modern editions. Old men shouting at clouds to take a dig at modern editions laying on your lawn.</p><p></p><p><em>Edit</em> I don't know why you keep name dropping him, or have to show a book with your names in it. No one is asking for that. And quite frankly, it doesn't matter. What matters is what appears in the actual books because that's what gamers had in front of them. That's how the masses were told to play. You could have been Gary's personal pool boy and that wouldn't change how your claims are factually incorrect. If it did matter, Rob (who grew up with Gary and presumably has a better knowledge of who he was than you), agrees with me in how the book was presented to be played.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 8396224, member: 15700"] Again... You made the claim that WoTC is pushing RAW, when back in the day all those rules were optional in 1e. And 1e was great because of all that "white space." That was the core argument you were making in several posts. Let's break this down: White space claim: Not true. There were [I]more [/I]rules in 1e DMG than in 5e. Heck, the 1e DMG has over 300,000 words compared to 5e's 80,000. That doesn't mean there are more than 3x as many rules because you can't compare word for word, but it is a pretty good indicator, especially when you look at the actual content of those books, that 1e had significantly more rules for things. This isn't my opinion or your opinion. These are things we can verify by looking at the books. That alone makes your claim dubious. But where it really goes off the rails is when you claim that all those rules in 1e are optional based on that one line despite[I] 2[/I] pages of warning against changing the rules right before it, but [I]don't[/I] consider 5e rules optional when it says the same thing about being optional and [I]doesn't [/I]have 2 pages of warnings telling you to adhere to the rules or it's dangerous. Is that clear enough? So I stand by my original post. You went on a diatribe against modern editions using false assumptions and speculation, showing a lack of understanding about both 1e and modern editions. Old men shouting at clouds to take a dig at modern editions laying on your lawn. [I]Edit[/I] I don't know why you keep name dropping him, or have to show a book with your names in it. No one is asking for that. And quite frankly, it doesn't matter. What matters is what appears in the actual books because that's what gamers had in front of them. That's how the masses were told to play. You could have been Gary's personal pool boy and that wouldn't change how your claims are factually incorrect. If it did matter, Rob (who grew up with Gary and presumably has a better knowledge of who he was than you), agrees with me in how the book was presented to be played. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On Grognardism...
Top