Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On homogeneity, or how I finally got past the people talking past each other part
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 4924001" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>Why? I mean, why do certain fans (of any edition) take it like a personal slight when people have problems with the edition? If I say 4e is too homogeneous (implied "for me, in my experience, relative to other stuff I've played and the ways I've played that other stuff"), that's nothing against 4e fans. As someone who does enjoy his 4e games, I don't feel like I'm insulting myself by pointing out areas where 4e struggles. I feel like I'm exposing weaknesses to make a better game. If the Coasties don't hear it, it doesn't matter, because it helps me to make my game a better game by finding areas where players aren't having a tremendous amount of fun and letting them have more fun. </p><p></p><p>Now, if I say "4e is great if you're a mental midget with all the creativity of an ironing board who likes getting spoon-fed gruel and being told it's duck l'orange" that IS a slight against 4e fans, and I'm wrong to say that.</p><p></p><p>Just like saying "Anyone who has a problem with 4e is obviously concealing their true hatred of change!" is wrong. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm of a mind that discussions of substance cannot occur unless there's a <em>problem to be solved</em>. If someone makes a new 4e class, for instance, the implication is that 4e has a flaw in that it didn't already have the class (and maybe it's just a flaw for the person who made the class). </p><p></p><p>If people weren't "complaining" (which is a pretty derogatory way to put it), then there would be no discussion of any relevance. Post after post of "I LOVE 4E AND IT IS BETTER THAN SEX" is not a discussion, it's just a dogma, a mantra. </p><p></p><p>If people weren't complaining, it would also be because nobody cared, which would be a dang tragedy for the game as a whole.</p><p></p><p>No, people try to correct problems with things they care about, and want to see get better. Problems always exist -- no edition is perfection -- so there are always things to work on, discuss, and maybe fix. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm a pretty regular poster here at ENWorld, and I haven't seen an invalid 4e claim in <em>months</em>, if not years (same thing with invalid 3e claims). The edition wars here aren't really fiery anymore -- simmering flames with people picking up the games they like and going off to play and discuss them. </p><p></p><p>To come in 5 pages into a constructive thread and spew venom about how everyone who is a critic is ignorant and mean-spirited, is, well, ignorant and mean-spirited. </p><p></p><p>Anyone who reacts like that is at best jumping at shadows, at worst, trolling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 4924001, member: 2067"] Why? I mean, why do certain fans (of any edition) take it like a personal slight when people have problems with the edition? If I say 4e is too homogeneous (implied "for me, in my experience, relative to other stuff I've played and the ways I've played that other stuff"), that's nothing against 4e fans. As someone who does enjoy his 4e games, I don't feel like I'm insulting myself by pointing out areas where 4e struggles. I feel like I'm exposing weaknesses to make a better game. If the Coasties don't hear it, it doesn't matter, because it helps me to make my game a better game by finding areas where players aren't having a tremendous amount of fun and letting them have more fun. Now, if I say "4e is great if you're a mental midget with all the creativity of an ironing board who likes getting spoon-fed gruel and being told it's duck l'orange" that IS a slight against 4e fans, and I'm wrong to say that. Just like saying "Anyone who has a problem with 4e is obviously concealing their true hatred of change!" is wrong. I'm of a mind that discussions of substance cannot occur unless there's a [I]problem to be solved[/I]. If someone makes a new 4e class, for instance, the implication is that 4e has a flaw in that it didn't already have the class (and maybe it's just a flaw for the person who made the class). If people weren't "complaining" (which is a pretty derogatory way to put it), then there would be no discussion of any relevance. Post after post of "I LOVE 4E AND IT IS BETTER THAN SEX" is not a discussion, it's just a dogma, a mantra. If people weren't complaining, it would also be because nobody cared, which would be a dang tragedy for the game as a whole. No, people try to correct problems with things they care about, and want to see get better. Problems always exist -- no edition is perfection -- so there are always things to work on, discuss, and maybe fix. I'm a pretty regular poster here at ENWorld, and I haven't seen an invalid 4e claim in [I]months[/I], if not years (same thing with invalid 3e claims). The edition wars here aren't really fiery anymore -- simmering flames with people picking up the games they like and going off to play and discuss them. To come in 5 pages into a constructive thread and spew venom about how everyone who is a critic is ignorant and mean-spirited, is, well, ignorant and mean-spirited. Anyone who reacts like that is at best jumping at shadows, at worst, trolling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On homogeneity, or how I finally got past the people talking past each other part
Top