Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 4924033" data-attributes="member: 957">Yes.  This is a fair statement.I'll admit that my 1/2 second knee-jerk reaction is to express surprise, because I find 3E to be quite reasonably balanced.But, if balance were the most important factor to me and I was moving from 4E to 3E, I would likely be appalled by the amount of balance I was giving up.  That is not to say that 3E has no balance.  Again, I find it more than sufficient.  But, why would I as a 4E fan even consider playing 3E when I can have such a better game experience sitting right there?  When there is a much better option sitting there that meets my standard of excellent balance, the difference between "more than sufficient" and "nowhere near good enough" becomes negligible.  They are both settling for less.And I can see how the reaction of 4E fans could be dismay when some claims that 4E does not offer enough diversity.  But the same reasoning applies.</blockquote>