Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
On magical items
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tehnai" data-source="post: 5778444" data-attributes="member: 59518"><p>There's been a lot of noise on this board about magical items, the christmas tree effect and so on. I see a lot of people saying that they would love to bring back the uniqueness of magical items to D&D, how they miss the sense of wonder that would bring finding a magical sword back in the 80's, where every +1 seemingly made the biggest difference in the world.</p><p></p><p>Then third edition came in with it's tight maths and concern for encounter balance, and treasure per level and so forth, making it nigh impossible for a GM to run a campaign with low magic without house-ruling the game in some way. 4e followed the same path, but was even more transparent about it.</p><p></p><p>Thus, the way to remove reliability on magical items (especially the few "Necessary" ones, such as 4e's weapon/armor/amulet trio) is to remove them from the combat maths as much as possible. In my mind, this would best achieved by removing non-situational to-hit modifiers from magical weapons, non-situational AC modifiers from armor and any non-situational modifiers from amulets</p><p></p><p>So a +1 sword would deal extra damage, which is always fun, but still rely on the wielder's skill at swinging it. It should also have something cool about it, such as providing light or what-have-you, but let us stay on the subject of numbers. Such a magical weapon could still give special modifiers to attack rolls, but only situationally, and thus not need to be part of the design math (let's say a +1 Assassin's blade would have a bonus to hit when attacking a target in the back, or a +2 Orc Slayer's Sword would get a bonus to hit against, obviously, orcs)</p><p></p><p>Armor would have to take a similar path in the name of balance, maybe making the bonuses damage resistance instead. </p><p></p><p>In short, the key to interesting magical items would be, in my humble opinion, to find a way to remove them from the designers calculations when building the game's system, and add them after the rest is built.</p><p></p><p>Also, I want a Horn of Bubbles in the core books.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tehnai, post: 5778444, member: 59518"] There's been a lot of noise on this board about magical items, the christmas tree effect and so on. I see a lot of people saying that they would love to bring back the uniqueness of magical items to D&D, how they miss the sense of wonder that would bring finding a magical sword back in the 80's, where every +1 seemingly made the biggest difference in the world. Then third edition came in with it's tight maths and concern for encounter balance, and treasure per level and so forth, making it nigh impossible for a GM to run a campaign with low magic without house-ruling the game in some way. 4e followed the same path, but was even more transparent about it. Thus, the way to remove reliability on magical items (especially the few "Necessary" ones, such as 4e's weapon/armor/amulet trio) is to remove them from the combat maths as much as possible. In my mind, this would best achieved by removing non-situational to-hit modifiers from magical weapons, non-situational AC modifiers from armor and any non-situational modifiers from amulets So a +1 sword would deal extra damage, which is always fun, but still rely on the wielder's skill at swinging it. It should also have something cool about it, such as providing light or what-have-you, but let us stay on the subject of numbers. Such a magical weapon could still give special modifiers to attack rolls, but only situationally, and thus not need to be part of the design math (let's say a +1 Assassin's blade would have a bonus to hit when attacking a target in the back, or a +2 Orc Slayer's Sword would get a bonus to hit against, obviously, orcs) Armor would have to take a similar path in the name of balance, maybe making the bonuses damage resistance instead. In short, the key to interesting magical items would be, in my humble opinion, to find a way to remove them from the designers calculations when building the game's system, and add them after the rest is built. Also, I want a Horn of Bubbles in the core books. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
On magical items
Top