Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8257976" data-attributes="member: 6779196">That makes sense. Now that you mention it, it was around the same time Mearls stopped tweeting his own takes on rules questions that the tenor of Sage Advice Changed.I remember at the time finding Mearls’ Tweeted rulings to be laughably bad and Crawford’s being the more reasonable. But it was nice to see that the two D&D leads ruled in different ways and served to reinforce the “rulings not rules” message. I almost wonder if that might have been intentional - have one designer give a ruling that sticks close to RAW and the other give a more out-there RAF take to reinforce the idea that the rules are meant to be flexible enough to allow both.</blockquote>