Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On rulings, rules, and Twitter, or: How Sage Advice Changed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 8357392" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>I'm not sure this is a practiced or unpracticed thing. BIFTs as roleplaying aids are fine, I suppose, but I'd prefer them to be less tropey and obvious in presentation if that's the case -- actually make the player think about what they want their character to be rather than some randomish lists of things they can pick and ignore however they want.</p><p></p><p>I mean, take Blades in the Dark -- there's less space on the sheet devoted to looks, heritage, background, and vice, but these things are massively influential in play. Because they're levers -- they're things that play can revolve upon, and also because you get to mark XP if they cause you issues/come up often in session. Take my game from last night, where a rogue ghost of a vanquished rival (Ulf Ironborn) crashed a negotiation I was in. Happens both the ghost and I were Skovlander heritage, which is a strong part of how that rivalry started. I leaned into heritage and used that as part of my attempt to banish the ghost (in addition to a playbook ability), which reminded everyone at the table of who we were as characters -- Skovland -- and the baggage that comes from that (my action was to command to ghost to abandon it's quest because it's just another in a line of failures -- Skovland lost against the Imperium, Ulf lost against us, and his spectre will lose again). This also hit my background, since I was a rebel in Skovland but abandoned that fight when I realized it was hopeless.</p><p></p><p>One line on my sheet, not even a sentence, taking up less space than a Trait, both helped define the course of the game (how and why we engaged Ulf to begin with) and continues to have impacts in play on a session by session basis. My character's heritage isn't something to be ignored, it's defining, and I'm rewarded for leaning into it.</p><p></p><p>BIFTs have none of this. They are, as you note, there for occasional consideration when you don't have a better idea of what your character does. This is my issue with BIFTs -- if this is the height they aspire to, the bar is so low as to be trivial. If, instead, they're actually meant to do more, to actually impact play and be a thing play is about, then, well, they fail utterly at this goal. I've run games and, after a few levels in, looked at BIFTs on character sheets for the first time, and been like "where has this been?" And this was running with a houserule that players can invoke their own BIFTs for immediate Inspiration on the current action without needing GM approval, just a description of how it works. And these are players that dug in deep to Blades.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 8357392, member: 16814"] I'm not sure this is a practiced or unpracticed thing. BIFTs as roleplaying aids are fine, I suppose, but I'd prefer them to be less tropey and obvious in presentation if that's the case -- actually make the player think about what they want their character to be rather than some randomish lists of things they can pick and ignore however they want. I mean, take Blades in the Dark -- there's less space on the sheet devoted to looks, heritage, background, and vice, but these things are massively influential in play. Because they're levers -- they're things that play can revolve upon, and also because you get to mark XP if they cause you issues/come up often in session. Take my game from last night, where a rogue ghost of a vanquished rival (Ulf Ironborn) crashed a negotiation I was in. Happens both the ghost and I were Skovlander heritage, which is a strong part of how that rivalry started. I leaned into heritage and used that as part of my attempt to banish the ghost (in addition to a playbook ability), which reminded everyone at the table of who we were as characters -- Skovland -- and the baggage that comes from that (my action was to command to ghost to abandon it's quest because it's just another in a line of failures -- Skovland lost against the Imperium, Ulf lost against us, and his spectre will lose again). This also hit my background, since I was a rebel in Skovland but abandoned that fight when I realized it was hopeless. One line on my sheet, not even a sentence, taking up less space than a Trait, both helped define the course of the game (how and why we engaged Ulf to begin with) and continues to have impacts in play on a session by session basis. My character's heritage isn't something to be ignored, it's defining, and I'm rewarded for leaning into it. BIFTs have none of this. They are, as you note, there for occasional consideration when you don't have a better idea of what your character does. This is my issue with BIFTs -- if this is the height they aspire to, the bar is so low as to be trivial. If, instead, they're actually meant to do more, to actually impact play and be a thing play is about, then, well, they fail utterly at this goal. I've run games and, after a few levels in, looked at BIFTs on character sheets for the first time, and been like "where has this been?" And this was running with a houserule that players can invoke their own BIFTs for immediate Inspiration on the current action without needing GM approval, just a description of how it works. And these are players that dug in deep to Blades. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On rulings, rules, and Twitter, or: How Sage Advice Changed
Top