Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8357805" data-attributes="member: 6704184">What granularity? A short person has an easier time finding things to hide behind than a tall person, while the tall person can reach things more easily and might even get over certain obstacles a little easier. There is no formula being used to calculate numerical bonuses by the foot, here. It's really weird to make these sorts of assumptions rather than just asking for clarification.There is no age of anything, anymore. No trend or movement will ever go away, ever again, unless it is fully and truly rejected by the whole of society. Which isn't likely. Even disco isn't actually dead, anymore. My friends who actually like being in a crowd and dancing with strangers went to a disco show in fall 2019. It was packed. So no, the &quot;age of simulationism&quot;, if such a thing ever existed in a meaningful sense, is not over. But more importantly, this particular thing has lttle at all to do with simulationism, and everything to do with character distinction. Any simulationism is incidental, like the relationship between strength and jumping in 5e, but more loosely defined.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 8357805, member: 6704184"] What granularity? A short person has an easier time finding things to hide behind than a tall person, while the tall person can reach things more easily and might even get over certain obstacles a little easier. There is no formula being used to calculate numerical bonuses by the foot, here. It's really weird to make these sorts of assumptions rather than just asking for clarification. There is no age of anything, anymore. No trend or movement will ever go away, ever again, unless it is fully and truly rejected by the whole of society. Which isn't likely. Even [I]disco[/I] isn't [I]actually[/I] dead, anymore. My friends who actually like being in a crowd and dancing with strangers went to a disco show in fall 2019. It was packed. So no, the "age of simulationism", if such a thing ever existed in a meaningful sense, is not over. But more importantly, this particular thing has lttle at all to do with simulationism, and everything to do with character distinction. Any simulationism is incidental, like the relationship between strength and jumping in 5e, but more loosely defined. [/QUOTE]

Verification