Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On rulings, rules, and Twitter, or: How Sage Advice Changed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="overgeeked" data-source="post: 8358279" data-attributes="member: 86653"><p>Not really. Alignment is terrible. It's worse than BIFTs. At least they are the player making direct choices / claims about how their character will act. Alignment is a nebulous argument factory. With a good enough talker / debater you can have people thinking up is down and left is right. Alignment assume an objective reality of morality where there is none. It's hot trash and has been for decades.</p><p></p><p>This is one of my sticking points with BIFTs. As mentioned by others, BIFTs are either too rigid or they're too loose and either essentially makes them meaningless. Too rigid and the character cannot grow or change; too fluid and there's no core to the character. And with the inspiration mechanic you basically have another point of possibly tension between the player and DM as you have to either convince the DM that what you're doing conforms with your BIFTs to get that sweet, sweet inspiration, or you're sitting there with no shiny tokens. That you can only have one at a time mitigates that a bit, but it's still a poorly implemented mechanic.</p><p></p><p>Something like Cortex+ or Cortex Prime its Values and Value Statements works so much better. They're built to be useful, mechanically, and changeable over time. If you're not familiar, they're typically a list of six values (Duty, Glory, Justice, Love, Power, and Truth). You rank them with dice (d4-d12, typically) based on how strongly you feel about that topic (positive or negative). Then you write a short statement about that value. That's key. When the statement is in accord with what you're doing it helps (adds dice to your pool) but when you decide to directly go against that statement, you get a boost (more dice), and can then change that value statement after the session. So you're baseline mechanically encouraged to act in accord with your values and you're able to choose to go against those values and change them over time (while also getting a mechanical boost for doing so). You're rewarded for adding drama and story to the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="overgeeked, post: 8358279, member: 86653"] Not really. Alignment is terrible. It's worse than BIFTs. At least they are the player making direct choices / claims about how their character will act. Alignment is a nebulous argument factory. With a good enough talker / debater you can have people thinking up is down and left is right. Alignment assume an objective reality of morality where there is none. It's hot trash and has been for decades. This is one of my sticking points with BIFTs. As mentioned by others, BIFTs are either too rigid or they're too loose and either essentially makes them meaningless. Too rigid and the character cannot grow or change; too fluid and there's no core to the character. And with the inspiration mechanic you basically have another point of possibly tension between the player and DM as you have to either convince the DM that what you're doing conforms with your BIFTs to get that sweet, sweet inspiration, or you're sitting there with no shiny tokens. That you can only have one at a time mitigates that a bit, but it's still a poorly implemented mechanic. Something like Cortex+ or Cortex Prime its Values and Value Statements works so much better. They're built to be useful, mechanically, and changeable over time. If you're not familiar, they're typically a list of six values (Duty, Glory, Justice, Love, Power, and Truth). You rank them with dice (d4-d12, typically) based on how strongly you feel about that topic (positive or negative). Then you write a short statement about that value. That's key. When the statement is in accord with what you're doing it helps (adds dice to your pool) but when you decide to directly go against that statement, you get a boost (more dice), and can then change that value statement after the session. So you're baseline mechanically encouraged to act in accord with your values and you're able to choose to go against those values and change them over time (while also getting a mechanical boost for doing so). You're rewarded for adding drama and story to the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On rulings, rules, and Twitter, or: How Sage Advice Changed
Top