Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On simulating things: what, why, and how?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 8671951" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Gotcha.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One problem with the real world is that, honestly, most of it is mind-numbingly mundane. The other problem with it is that the parts that are exciting are such that if you are not an expert, if you make one mistake, you're dead. GMs and Players are not, typically, experts at the exciting parts of the real world - or at least not with many of them. In addition, most of the time we design things such that the simulation is not the goal - it stands between the PCs and the goal, as a complication - you must climb the ice-covered mountain (and we simulate that climb) in order to get at the white dragon that has been plaguing the town. This means that, from the player's point of view, the simulation is something extraneous.</p><p></p><p>So, in order to make simulating the real world worthwhile, 1) The GM typically has to pick up a simulation created by someone with greater expertise, and then 2) the GM typically has to add in a layer of abstraction between the players and that simulation - lean on the characters being experts, rather than the players. This can lead to giving various characters spotlight time, but it means the players don't actually make the decisions relevant to the simulation. </p><p></p><p>And then, we are left wondering what the point of the simulation really was.</p><p></p><p>So, when, how, and why are answered by finding the times when simulation doesn't meet the usual issues of simulation.</p><p></p><p>1) When it is not mind-numbingly mundane - How many pairs of socks, or torches, a character is carrying may be <em>meaningful</em> insofar as getting trench foot or having your light go out in a dungeon are bad, those choices are not typically <em>interesting</em>. </p><p></p><p>2) When it is something for which expertise is less relevant - When the point of the simulation is to explore the thing being simulated, and nobody is expected to understand it to start with, and not understanding it won't kill the characters</p><p></p><p>3) When the thing simulated is central to the issues the PCs are choosing to deal with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 8671951, member: 177"] Gotcha. One problem with the real world is that, honestly, most of it is mind-numbingly mundane. The other problem with it is that the parts that are exciting are such that if you are not an expert, if you make one mistake, you're dead. GMs and Players are not, typically, experts at the exciting parts of the real world - or at least not with many of them. In addition, most of the time we design things such that the simulation is not the goal - it stands between the PCs and the goal, as a complication - you must climb the ice-covered mountain (and we simulate that climb) in order to get at the white dragon that has been plaguing the town. This means that, from the player's point of view, the simulation is something extraneous. So, in order to make simulating the real world worthwhile, 1) The GM typically has to pick up a simulation created by someone with greater expertise, and then 2) the GM typically has to add in a layer of abstraction between the players and that simulation - lean on the characters being experts, rather than the players. This can lead to giving various characters spotlight time, but it means the players don't actually make the decisions relevant to the simulation. And then, we are left wondering what the point of the simulation really was. So, when, how, and why are answered by finding the times when simulation doesn't meet the usual issues of simulation. 1) When it is not mind-numbingly mundane - How many pairs of socks, or torches, a character is carrying may be [I]meaningful[/I] insofar as getting trench foot or having your light go out in a dungeon are bad, those choices are not typically [I]interesting[/I]. 2) When it is something for which expertise is less relevant - When the point of the simulation is to explore the thing being simulated, and nobody is expected to understand it to start with, and not understanding it won't kill the characters 3) When the thing simulated is central to the issues the PCs are choosing to deal with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On simulating things: what, why, and how?
Top