Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On simulating things: what, why, and how?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8673070" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>But, that's not really a simulation though. That's just the people agreeing that X is okay. Since X can be anything, so long as it's acceptable to the table, then it's not really modeling anything because if you ran the same simulation fifteen times, you'd get 15, sometimes contradictory, answers.</p><p></p><p>If something is a simulation, then running that simulation from similar initial inputs should generate similar results. "Translating the technical aspects of the game into a credible fiction" isn't simulation, in the OP's sense of the word, at all.</p><p></p><p>The true problem is, people are still trying to bang that drum that "make stuff up" is a simulation. In a real simulation, the players and the DM shouldn't actually matter all that much. The simulation would actually tell you what happened.</p><p></p><p>So, no, in the OP's definition, there are very few actual simulation based RPG's out there. A few. Things like HARN or GURPS, and a handful of far more rigorous systems, but, D&D? Not even close.</p><p></p><p>AFAIK, the only reason to continuously try to bang the drum of "D&D as simulation" is to gatekeep the game away from those pesky folks that don't play the same way. Then, you simply define "simulation" as "anything I do at my table, that I like to do" and anything that's not what you like to do is not simulation. Has zero to do with actual game design and everything to do with people trying to shout down any sort of changes to the game that a certain segment of the fandom doesn't like. It's the same arguments that have been floated around since 2007. We MUST KEEP D&D PURE!!! We must never acknowledge that D&D is not in any real way a simulation (as per the dictionary, non-jargon meaning of the word) because if we acknowledge that in any form, that means that we open the door for all those hated mechanics that the pure of gamer must shun!</p><p></p><p>We MUST NOT EVER lower our guard!!! We must DEFEND THE HONOR OF D&D!! </p><p></p><p>It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetically obvious.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 8673070, member: 22779"] But, that's not really a simulation though. That's just the people agreeing that X is okay. Since X can be anything, so long as it's acceptable to the table, then it's not really modeling anything because if you ran the same simulation fifteen times, you'd get 15, sometimes contradictory, answers. If something is a simulation, then running that simulation from similar initial inputs should generate similar results. "Translating the technical aspects of the game into a credible fiction" isn't simulation, in the OP's sense of the word, at all. The true problem is, people are still trying to bang that drum that "make stuff up" is a simulation. In a real simulation, the players and the DM shouldn't actually matter all that much. The simulation would actually tell you what happened. So, no, in the OP's definition, there are very few actual simulation based RPG's out there. A few. Things like HARN or GURPS, and a handful of far more rigorous systems, but, D&D? Not even close. AFAIK, the only reason to continuously try to bang the drum of "D&D as simulation" is to gatekeep the game away from those pesky folks that don't play the same way. Then, you simply define "simulation" as "anything I do at my table, that I like to do" and anything that's not what you like to do is not simulation. Has zero to do with actual game design and everything to do with people trying to shout down any sort of changes to the game that a certain segment of the fandom doesn't like. It's the same arguments that have been floated around since 2007. We MUST KEEP D&D PURE!!! We must never acknowledge that D&D is not in any real way a simulation (as per the dictionary, non-jargon meaning of the word) because if we acknowledge that in any form, that means that we open the door for all those hated mechanics that the pure of gamer must shun! We MUST NOT EVER lower our guard!!! We must DEFEND THE HONOR OF D&D!! It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetically obvious. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On simulating things: what, why, and how?
Top