Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
On smaller bonuses and the d20 mechanic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flatus Maximus" data-source="post: 5801708" data-attributes="member: 55114"><p>The d20 mechanic boils down to: 1d20+M >= TN, where TN = target number (e.g., AC, save DC) and M = total modifier relevant to the task. Equivalently, 1d20 >= TN-M.</p><p></p><p>Note that TN-M < 1 is the condition for auto-success, while TN-M > 20 is the condition for auto-fail; in other words, if the outcome is to have any uncertainty, then we must have 1 <= TN-M <= 20. For rolls that are to happen with any regularity, it would seem most fun if TN-M stays within this range.</p><p></p><p>Also note that TN needs to be relatively large, since otherwise PCs are “good” at the task even with no modifier – players might not feel all that heroic if the task is something that commoners can routinely do. This, in turn, forces M to be relatively large, since otherwise TN-M falls out of the range 1-20.</p><p></p><p>On a psychological note, the smaller the modifier relative to the size of the die, the less the player may feel that the PC has any impact on the determination of the outcome. (I call this the “heft” of the modifier.) For example, for some (most?) people, rolling 1d20+2 probably doesn’t feel all that different from rolling 1d20, and these folks may not feel that their PC has much influence on the outcome, <em>even when</em> TN-M is very small (that is, even when they are very likely to succeed anyway).</p><p></p><p>So, for the d20 mechanic, it seems necessary that target numbers must be relatively large, so that PCs, and not just commoners, are required to do the job; as well as modifiers, so that PCs have a chance to succeed with larger target numbers and players feel that they have a noticeable effect on the outcomes of the mechanic.</p><p></p><p>If the designers of D&Dn are serious about wanting to keep bonuses relatively small, then it would seem that they can’t just reduce the size of the target numbers. The only other parameter remaining that we can tweak is the size of the die. For example, if we replace the d20 with the d10, then target numbers can be considerably smaller, which we have seen, means that bonuses can be considerably smaller. What’s more, the +2 in a 1d10+2 roll is likely to feel more “hefty,” so that the player feels that their PC has more of a significant effect on determining the outcome of the roll. Edit: As a side benefit, the arithmetic is likely to involve only single-digits.</p><p></p><p>Quite naturally, TN and M should grow with level. However, with 20-30 levels, even with modest growth per level, the difference between low levels and higher levels will be great. With fewer levels and a smaller starting point for TN and M, combined with modest growth, will result in characters that are not so far apart at the extremes of the range of levels. Of course, players expect that the higher level PCs will be clearly superior to the lower level PCs, but perhaps by tweaking these parameters, these two groups of PCs can still campaign together.</p><p></p><p>OK, getting kinda long so I'll stop there. Not sure what else I had to say anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flatus Maximus, post: 5801708, member: 55114"] The d20 mechanic boils down to: 1d20+M >= TN, where TN = target number (e.g., AC, save DC) and M = total modifier relevant to the task. Equivalently, 1d20 >= TN-M. Note that TN-M < 1 is the condition for auto-success, while TN-M > 20 is the condition for auto-fail; in other words, if the outcome is to have any uncertainty, then we must have 1 <= TN-M <= 20. For rolls that are to happen with any regularity, it would seem most fun if TN-M stays within this range. Also note that TN needs to be relatively large, since otherwise PCs are “good” at the task even with no modifier – players might not feel all that heroic if the task is something that commoners can routinely do. This, in turn, forces M to be relatively large, since otherwise TN-M falls out of the range 1-20. On a psychological note, the smaller the modifier relative to the size of the die, the less the player may feel that the PC has any impact on the determination of the outcome. (I call this the “heft” of the modifier.) For example, for some (most?) people, rolling 1d20+2 probably doesn’t feel all that different from rolling 1d20, and these folks may not feel that their PC has much influence on the outcome, [i]even when[/i] TN-M is very small (that is, even when they are very likely to succeed anyway). So, for the d20 mechanic, it seems necessary that target numbers must be relatively large, so that PCs, and not just commoners, are required to do the job; as well as modifiers, so that PCs have a chance to succeed with larger target numbers and players feel that they have a noticeable effect on the outcomes of the mechanic. If the designers of D&Dn are serious about wanting to keep bonuses relatively small, then it would seem that they can’t just reduce the size of the target numbers. The only other parameter remaining that we can tweak is the size of the die. For example, if we replace the d20 with the d10, then target numbers can be considerably smaller, which we have seen, means that bonuses can be considerably smaller. What’s more, the +2 in a 1d10+2 roll is likely to feel more “hefty,” so that the player feels that their PC has more of a significant effect on determining the outcome of the roll. Edit: As a side benefit, the arithmetic is likely to involve only single-digits. Quite naturally, TN and M should grow with level. However, with 20-30 levels, even with modest growth per level, the difference between low levels and higher levels will be great. With fewer levels and a smaller starting point for TN and M, combined with modest growth, will result in characters that are not so far apart at the extremes of the range of levels. Of course, players expect that the higher level PCs will be clearly superior to the lower level PCs, but perhaps by tweaking these parameters, these two groups of PCs can still campaign together. OK, getting kinda long so I'll stop there. Not sure what else I had to say anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
On smaller bonuses and the d20 mechanic
Top