Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On the marketing of 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 4922762" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>There were people on these very boards who said they were unlikely to buy 4Ed because of the non-renewal of licenses to Paizo for the magazines, and the cessation of the Dragonlance license, etc. Some even called for a boycott.</p><p></p><p>The announcement of class & race exclusions was a detriment. From a marketing standpoint, it was a tactic that could <strong>only</strong> hurt sales. Why? Because that announcement turned off people for whom those excluded features meant their favorite race or class was gone, or that their campaign was non-convertible. By simply staying silent as to those changes, that group - or a portion thereof (esp. those who pre-ordered the books)- would not have known about the unpalatable change until after the product was in their hands. There was, in addition, no indication that for those who viewed these changes positively that it was a selling point. IOW, while they may have liked the racial or class changes, those changes were not a <em>deciding</em> factor in whether they intended to buy the game. More often than not, people cited dissatisfaction with 3.X in general or certain mechanical changes as being more important selling points for the new edition.</p><p></p><p>And while better marketing may not have converted anyone to 4Ed, it probably would have meant more sales. Those sales would be to people who might have bought the game and still not converted, but for being turned off by the marketing campaign.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 4922762, member: 19675"] There were people on these very boards who said they were unlikely to buy 4Ed because of the non-renewal of licenses to Paizo for the magazines, and the cessation of the Dragonlance license, etc. Some even called for a boycott. The announcement of class & race exclusions was a detriment. From a marketing standpoint, it was a tactic that could [B]only[/B] hurt sales. Why? Because that announcement turned off people for whom those excluded features meant their favorite race or class was gone, or that their campaign was non-convertible. By simply staying silent as to those changes, that group - or a portion thereof (esp. those who pre-ordered the books)- would not have known about the unpalatable change until after the product was in their hands. There was, in addition, no indication that for those who viewed these changes positively that it was a selling point. IOW, while they may have liked the racial or class changes, those changes were not a [I]deciding[/I] factor in whether they intended to buy the game. More often than not, people cited dissatisfaction with 3.X in general or certain mechanical changes as being more important selling points for the new edition. And while better marketing may not have converted anyone to 4Ed, it probably would have meant more sales. Those sales would be to people who might have bought the game and still not converted, but for being turned off by the marketing campaign. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On the marketing of 4E
Top