Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On the marketing of 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4927044" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>I could take from this thread that people prefer to be lied to professionally by marketing then hearing designers honest thoughts. </p><p></p><p>If a designer tells you an old rule didn't work well and was "un-fun" and he has created a new rule that works better and is more fun, is that really an insult to you? Or is it not more a promise: "I think I found a flaw and found a way to fix it."</p><p></p><p></p><p>But maybe it's just that marketing can't succeed for everyone. </p><p>Pathfinders goal - according to marketing and designer speech - was not an overhaul of the system. It was not there to fix all the various problems I found with the game (despite liking it a lot at the same time.) It is "just" there to keep 3E in print. Maybe a little to create a fresh breeze making it interesting again. But nothing that addresses my issues with the system. </p><p>If I wanted to be offended, I could say they are just trying to sell me the same old and don't really bother with innovation, believing I was stupid enough to fall for that trick.</p><p></p><p>Of course, that's selling them short and putting a negative spin on what they did. </p><p></p><p>In fact, I think they are doing pretty good work for what the set out to do and there is a significant market that wants what they do. I am not part of that market. Their marketing is not aimed at me. That's fine with me. </p><p></p><p>I think 4E marketing succeeded pretty well, overall. It attracted the audience it targetted. It got me interested and excited. It motiviated fans to create their own adventures based on preview materials and Gameday material. Some people felt offended, but I didn't gain the impression so far they liked the rules, either. If that's true, it's only failure is that it didn't dupe people that wouldn't care for the system to buy it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> (But I think it even got that covered.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4927044, member: 710"] I could take from this thread that people prefer to be lied to professionally by marketing then hearing designers honest thoughts. If a designer tells you an old rule didn't work well and was "un-fun" and he has created a new rule that works better and is more fun, is that really an insult to you? Or is it not more a promise: "I think I found a flaw and found a way to fix it." But maybe it's just that marketing can't succeed for everyone. Pathfinders goal - according to marketing and designer speech - was not an overhaul of the system. It was not there to fix all the various problems I found with the game (despite liking it a lot at the same time.) It is "just" there to keep 3E in print. Maybe a little to create a fresh breeze making it interesting again. But nothing that addresses my issues with the system. If I wanted to be offended, I could say they are just trying to sell me the same old and don't really bother with innovation, believing I was stupid enough to fall for that trick. Of course, that's selling them short and putting a negative spin on what they did. In fact, I think they are doing pretty good work for what the set out to do and there is a significant market that wants what they do. I am not part of that market. Their marketing is not aimed at me. That's fine with me. I think 4E marketing succeeded pretty well, overall. It attracted the audience it targetted. It got me interested and excited. It motiviated fans to create their own adventures based on preview materials and Gameday material. Some people felt offended, but I didn't gain the impression so far they liked the rules, either. If that's true, it's only failure is that it didn't dupe people that wouldn't care for the system to buy it. ;) (But I think it even got that covered.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On the marketing of 4E
Top