Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On the marketing of 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lutecius" data-source="post: 4931887" data-attributes="member: 60332"><p>Then it should have been possible to rebalance things without breaking the mold, don't you think?</p><p></p><p>Fleshing out doesn't necessarily mean changing radically (just saying. I'm not very familiar with 0D&D but the argument seems flawed)</p><p></p><p>Uhm... no.</p><p>I do think 3e was a huge step forward but 4e is just as much a departure.</p><p>First, the power system is an essential part of 4e. Ability scores also work differently. Specific power lists for every class and restrictions on multiclassing make character building quite different. NPCs and monsters now work under completely different assumptions. The nerfing of save-or-die effects and the "extended sweet spot" over 30 levels certainly changed the gaming experience, for good or ill. Those are not "a few odds and sods".</p><p></p><p></p><p>On topic,</p><p></p><p>I did find the marketing and publishing strategy off-putting. With a different approach I might have bought the first core books but ultimately I don't like 4e's design philosophy (more abstract, less flexible) so it probably wouldn't have made a difference for me (I doubt many are going to admit otherwise anyway, most people like to think of themselves as logical.)</p><p></p><p>Unlike others here, I didn't expect backward compatibility and really wanted significant changes (that's the point of a new edition.) For me 3e definitely had balance issue, I was never a fan of Vancian casting, I found the old alignment and cosmology awkward and couldn't care less about the gnome. Actually, many of the announced changes sounded good to me (at first)</p><p></p><p>And yet, even before I realised I wouldn't like the "fixes", I found WotC's attitude really arrogant (peremptory statements about what is fun/cool and what isn't, unnecessarily aggravating cartoons, designer jokes that could be funny for those who like a particular change but come off as rubbing it in to those who don't, imprudent ddi announcements, overpriced previews…)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lutecius, post: 4931887, member: 60332"] Then it should have been possible to rebalance things without breaking the mold, don't you think? Fleshing out doesn't necessarily mean changing radically (just saying. I'm not very familiar with 0D&D but the argument seems flawed) Uhm... no. I do think 3e was a huge step forward but 4e is just as much a departure. First, the power system is an essential part of 4e. Ability scores also work differently. Specific power lists for every class and restrictions on multiclassing make character building quite different. NPCs and monsters now work under completely different assumptions. The nerfing of save-or-die effects and the "extended sweet spot" over 30 levels certainly changed the gaming experience, for good or ill. Those are not "a few odds and sods". On topic, I did find the marketing and publishing strategy off-putting. With a different approach I might have bought the first core books but ultimately I don't like 4e's design philosophy (more abstract, less flexible) so it probably wouldn't have made a difference for me (I doubt many are going to admit otherwise anyway, most people like to think of themselves as logical.) Unlike others here, I didn't expect backward compatibility and really wanted significant changes (that's the point of a new edition.) For me 3e definitely had balance issue, I was never a fan of Vancian casting, I found the old alignment and cosmology awkward and couldn't care less about the gnome. Actually, many of the announced changes sounded good to me (at first) And yet, even before I realised I wouldn't like the "fixes", I found WotC's attitude really arrogant (peremptory statements about what is fun/cool and what isn't, unnecessarily aggravating cartoons, designer jokes that could be funny for those who like a particular change but come off as rubbing it in to those who don't, imprudent ddi announcements, overpriced previews…) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On the marketing of 4E
Top