Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On the marketing of 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 4933429" data-attributes="member: 1288"><p>Ah. I see what you're saying now, but I don't think it's an example of "change for change's sake." For it to be, the race of the actor would have to have been a deciding factor to the studio one way or the other, and frankly, I just don't think it was. I think it more likely that they just didn't <em>care</em>. (Much like the character of Felix Lighter in the Bond films, who has been white and black.)</p><p></p><p>True, they (probably) didn't say "Let's make this character Race X for Reason Y." But for me, when I hear "change for change's sake," it means that someone has to have consciously decided to make said change for no other reason than because it was different from what came before. And I don't think that's likely what happened here, because I don't think there was any conscious decision at all in that regard. I think the studio probably <em>also</em> didn't say "Let's make this character Race X just for the hell of it." I believe what they probably said was, "Let's cast Person X," and when someone pointed out that it would change the race, they said, "So?"</p><p></p><p>In other words, that particular change doesn't fall into <em>either</em> the "motivated change" or the "change for change's sake" category. I think it falls into the "repercussions of some other decision that nobody cared about one way or the other" category.</p><p></p><p>Of course, I could be wrong. Maybe Burton <em>did</em> specifically want a black Dent. Maybe the studio specifically wanted a white Dent. I'm obviously not privy to that. But if so, I'd wager some real money that each had his reasons--even if they were bad ones.</p><p></p><p>But what I'm getting at is, not every single change needs to be one or the other, "motivated" or "for change's sake." Sometimes they're just the natural results of a prior decision, and nobody felt them important enough to remain consistent.</p><p></p><p>So yes, they could have found a white actor for the first one, or a black actor for the third. I just don't think, once they had their first choice, that they could be bothered to worry about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 4933429, member: 1288"] Ah. I see what you're saying now, but I don't think it's an example of "change for change's sake." For it to be, the race of the actor would have to have been a deciding factor to the studio one way or the other, and frankly, I just don't think it was. I think it more likely that they just didn't [i]care[/i]. (Much like the character of Felix Lighter in the Bond films, who has been white and black.) True, they (probably) didn't say "Let's make this character Race X for Reason Y." But for me, when I hear "change for change's sake," it means that someone has to have consciously decided to make said change for no other reason than because it was different from what came before. And I don't think that's likely what happened here, because I don't think there was any conscious decision at all in that regard. I think the studio probably [i]also[/i] didn't say "Let's make this character Race X just for the hell of it." I believe what they probably said was, "Let's cast Person X," and when someone pointed out that it would change the race, they said, "So?" In other words, that particular change doesn't fall into [i]either[/i] the "motivated change" or the "change for change's sake" category. I think it falls into the "repercussions of some other decision that nobody cared about one way or the other" category. Of course, I could be wrong. Maybe Burton [i]did[/i] specifically want a black Dent. Maybe the studio specifically wanted a white Dent. I'm obviously not privy to that. But if so, I'd wager some real money that each had his reasons--even if they were bad ones. But what I'm getting at is, not every single change needs to be one or the other, "motivated" or "for change's sake." Sometimes they're just the natural results of a prior decision, and nobody felt them important enough to remain consistent. So yes, they could have found a white actor for the first one, or a black actor for the third. I just don't think, once they had their first choice, that they could be bothered to worry about it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
On the marketing of 4E
Top