Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mark CMG" data-source="post: 6765879" data-attributes="member: 10479"><p>Yeah, I'm not sure how that works either.  At some point, some one person needs to write it, or several someones need to write sections of it, and likewise with the editing.  Certainly, it is never a matter of each company writing every other word. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  Then, of course, it falls to someone or some group to do the proofing.  At some point, maybe years from now, we'll know more but I am guessing it works more along the lines of WotC loaning their setting and system bibles to GR and giving them an outline of what they want covered.  Then I am guessing GR writes and edits the text of the project and passes it back to WotC for approval.  Then some changes are suggested to GR who does them or they are handled at WotC (with GR being informed of them with the chance to suggest some adjustments based on what GR was thinking when they wrote it).  Then a final edit, I suppose, followed by proofing at one company or the other.  Anything more convoluted than that would make it tough to hit deadlines, I think, as well as being a license for incoherence.  Plus, I am guessing that seems enough like a collaboration for someone to be able to say it is 50/50 without most people objecting to such a designation.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification