Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On whether sorcerers and wizards should be merged or not, (they shouldn't)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Todd Roybark" data-source="post: 7917409" data-attributes="member: 6920677"><p><em>Long Post-Responses to Multiple points</em></p><p></p><p>Wow..so much for the peaceful detente that happened around page 14. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😀" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" title="Grinning face :grinning:" data-shortname=":grinning:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p><p></p><p>A sorcerer is an Artisanal caster, with a non algorithmically selected set of themed spells.</p><p>The Wizard is the big box store of spells.</p><p></p><p>The quote of mine that Moonsong used at the <em>very</em> beginning of this thread was in direct response to the idea of increasing the Sorcerers’ spell list, and spells known.</p><p></p><p>(& to be honest I allow a 1st level Sorcerer to have 3 spells known instead of 2)</p><p></p><p>As Undrave, so rightfully stated earlier, the big spell list <em>is</em> the 5e Wizards shtick with little else in the class to represent flavor or personality.</p><p></p><p>So Increasing the Sorcerer spell list, Increasing Sorcerer spells known, Increasing the versatility of Font of Magic to allow for cool effects like THP, and essentially bonus spells.....all of these together, is a bridge too far for me, and makes the Sorcerer supreme, ( and not like Dr. Strange).</p><p></p><p>If the Sorcerer gets all of the above, then the Wizard should get something big for the sake of equality, like the ability to Concentrate on two spells at a time.</p><p></p><p>High Intelligence used to be useful, either in learning extra languages ( alleviating the need to take Comp Lang in 1e), or in 3e, high INT gave skill points.</p><p></p><p> 5e gives you <em>nothing</em> for a High INT. If the wizard is supposed to be <em>educated</em> </p><p>“<em>Only a Scholar</em>” as FrogReaver insists, shouldn’t that education be <em>mechanically</em> represented? </p><p></p><p>If the Wizard spell list length <em>is</em> the way 5e mechanically represents “the scholar”...then no spell list increase for the Sorc is warranted, without some other compensation for the Wiz.</p><p></p><p>As it stands now, I personally think the Wizard should have 3 Skill Points, automatic proficiency in the near useless Calligraphy tool, and the ability to get Expertise in Arcana.</p><p></p><p>An 8 INT Cleric of Knowledge with 1 level of Ranger with Favored Enemy Devils can out sage any Wizard in <em>Descent to Avernus</em> thru Expertise and Advantage on INT/WIS checks against Devils.</p><p></p><p>CHA is <em>a way better stat</em> than INT in 5e. Every Wizard I have seen in 5e has Charm Person selected. A sorcerer with their high CHA does not <em>need</em> the spell. Same could be said for the Disguise Self spell, especially if Prof. w/ the Disguise kit is had. </p><p>A CHA (Intimidate) check can replicate, ( in limited fashion), one of the Fear spells etc. </p><p></p><p><em>The value of CHA ability checks to bypass the need to use spells is not being properly evaluated in this thread</em>. (My points excepted, of course <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😉" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" title="Winking face :wink:" data-shortname=":wink:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />).</p><p></p><p>As for what the Wizard class has lost- here are just some of things <em>not mentioned yet</em>:</p><p></p><p>1- Wizards used to be the only class with 8th or 9th level spells.</p><p>2 - Wizards used to have 2 Ninth level spell slots at Capstone Levels.</p><p>3- The Origins of Metamagic goes back to 1e through the <em>Extension</em> line of M/U spells.</p><p></p><p>Metamagic spells in 2e were Wizard spells, with limited access granted to some cool, but odd and not commonly used Priestly Spheres.</p><p></p><p>As has been pointed out Metamagic <em>was not</em> the Sorcerer shtick in 3e. </p><p>Suddenly, now in 5e, Metamagic is the <em>best</em> way to represent the soul of the class in 5e. </p><p>Yet, at the creation of the Sorcerer class, metamagic was intentionally designed to be a SUBPAR option for the Sorc. </p><p></p><p>(Predicted response from others: Now everyone is a spontaneous caster...yada, yada <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="👼" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f47c.png" title="Baby angel :angel:" data-shortname=":angel:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />)</p><p></p><p>4- The Paradigm shift that has happened in imagination due to the sorcerer class being ‘split’ from the wizard. </p><p></p><p>For proof of this:</p><p></p><p>The fictional character Harry Blackstone Copperfield Dresden, <em>self described in the book series as a wizard</em>, is spec’d in D&D mechanics as a <em>Sorcerer</em>, by appreciative fans of the books in this thread.</p><p></p><p><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🎤" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f3a4.png" title="Microphone :microphone:" data-shortname=":microphone:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />+ Drop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Todd Roybark, post: 7917409, member: 6920677"] [I]Long Post-Responses to Multiple points[/I] Wow..so much for the peaceful detente that happened around page 14. 😀 A sorcerer is an Artisanal caster, with a non algorithmically selected set of themed spells. The Wizard is the big box store of spells. The quote of mine that Moonsong used at the [I]very[/I] beginning of this thread was in direct response to the idea of increasing the Sorcerers’ spell list, and spells known. (& to be honest I allow a 1st level Sorcerer to have 3 spells known instead of 2) As Undrave, so rightfully stated earlier, the big spell list [I]is[/I] the 5e Wizards shtick with little else in the class to represent flavor or personality. So Increasing the Sorcerer spell list, Increasing Sorcerer spells known, Increasing the versatility of Font of Magic to allow for cool effects like THP, and essentially bonus spells.....all of these together, is a bridge too far for me, and makes the Sorcerer supreme, ( and not like Dr. Strange). If the Sorcerer gets all of the above, then the Wizard should get something big for the sake of equality, like the ability to Concentrate on two spells at a time. High Intelligence used to be useful, either in learning extra languages ( alleviating the need to take Comp Lang in 1e), or in 3e, high INT gave skill points. 5e gives you [I]nothing[/I] for a High INT. If the wizard is supposed to be [I]educated[/I] “[I]Only a Scholar[/I]” as FrogReaver insists, shouldn’t that education be [I]mechanically[/I] represented? If the Wizard spell list length [I]is[/I] the way 5e mechanically represents “the scholar”...then no spell list increase for the Sorc is warranted, without some other compensation for the Wiz. As it stands now, I personally think the Wizard should have 3 Skill Points, automatic proficiency in the near useless Calligraphy tool, and the ability to get Expertise in Arcana. An 8 INT Cleric of Knowledge with 1 level of Ranger with Favored Enemy Devils can out sage any Wizard in [I]Descent to Avernus[/I] thru Expertise and Advantage on INT/WIS checks against Devils. CHA is [I]a way better stat[/I] than INT in 5e. Every Wizard I have seen in 5e has Charm Person selected. A sorcerer with their high CHA does not [I]need[/I] the spell. Same could be said for the Disguise Self spell, especially if Prof. w/ the Disguise kit is had. A CHA (Intimidate) check can replicate, ( in limited fashion), one of the Fear spells etc. [I]The value of CHA ability checks to bypass the need to use spells is not being properly evaluated in this thread[/I]. (My points excepted, of course 😉). As for what the Wizard class has lost- here are just some of things [I]not mentioned yet[/I]: 1- Wizards used to be the only class with 8th or 9th level spells. 2 - Wizards used to have 2 Ninth level spell slots at Capstone Levels. 3- The Origins of Metamagic goes back to 1e through the [I]Extension[/I] line of M/U spells. Metamagic spells in 2e were Wizard spells, with limited access granted to some cool, but odd and not commonly used Priestly Spheres. As has been pointed out Metamagic [I]was not[/I] the Sorcerer shtick in 3e. Suddenly, now in 5e, Metamagic is the [I]best[/I] way to represent the soul of the class in 5e. Yet, at the creation of the Sorcerer class, metamagic was intentionally designed to be a SUBPAR option for the Sorc. (Predicted response from others: Now everyone is a spontaneous caster...yada, yada 👼) 4- The Paradigm shift that has happened in imagination due to the sorcerer class being ‘split’ from the wizard. For proof of this: The fictional character Harry Blackstone Copperfield Dresden, [I]self described in the book series as a wizard[/I], is spec’d in D&D mechanics as a [I]Sorcerer[/I], by appreciative fans of the books in this thread. 🎤+ Drop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On whether sorcerers and wizards should be merged or not, (they shouldn't)
Top