Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
once and for all, can you wield 2 implements?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tripgnosis" data-source="post: 4465973" data-attributes="member: 27760"><p>after reading the PHB some more (pg 224, as suggested) I'm wondering if "Implement" refers both to the <em>type</em> AND the <em>slot</em>. If so, then you could only benefit from one implement at a time whether the bonus was passive <em>or</em> active. even though you could feasibly carry and 'wield' both implements, only one's effects would be active. Just as, though your could feasibly wear 16 amulets like a medieval Mr-T, you would only receive the benefits of one amulet whether those benefits were passive or active. I think this interpretation is about as fair as you could get, and unfortunately the PHB is a bit vague on this. It says each magical item takes up a slot, but it never defines the slot that the implement holds.</p><p></p><p>in any case, to avoid confusion, I would suggest not wielding 2 implements, or even trying to. The rules are crystal clear hen it comes to wielding ONE implement.... </p><p></p><p>ANother point to consider is 2 weapon fighting. The PHB is pretty clear that even though you can hold a weapon in each hand, you don't benefit from that unless you have a feat or power that specifically says so. You can logically apply this to implements as well, and since no feat or power (as of yet) specifically grants benefits from wielding 2 implements, it's safe to assume that you cannot. It's all still a bit fuzzy, but I think this interpretation is at least fair and balanced. And that's what I'm looking for. I don't want to exploit the rules....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tripgnosis, post: 4465973, member: 27760"] after reading the PHB some more (pg 224, as suggested) I'm wondering if "Implement" refers both to the [I]type[/I] AND the [I]slot[/I]. If so, then you could only benefit from one implement at a time whether the bonus was passive [I]or[/I] active. even though you could feasibly carry and 'wield' both implements, only one's effects would be active. Just as, though your could feasibly wear 16 amulets like a medieval Mr-T, you would only receive the benefits of one amulet whether those benefits were passive or active. I think this interpretation is about as fair as you could get, and unfortunately the PHB is a bit vague on this. It says each magical item takes up a slot, but it never defines the slot that the implement holds. in any case, to avoid confusion, I would suggest not wielding 2 implements, or even trying to. The rules are crystal clear hen it comes to wielding ONE implement.... ANother point to consider is 2 weapon fighting. The PHB is pretty clear that even though you can hold a weapon in each hand, you don't benefit from that unless you have a feat or power that specifically says so. You can logically apply this to implements as well, and since no feat or power (as of yet) specifically grants benefits from wielding 2 implements, it's safe to assume that you cannot. It's all still a bit fuzzy, but I think this interpretation is at least fair and balanced. And that's what I'm looking for. I don't want to exploit the rules.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
once and for all, can you wield 2 implements?
Top