Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 3927074" data-attributes="member: 10177">Glad to hear C&amp;C isn't for you, but you don't need to creating insults out of implications you want to take out of them while your telling us this. Those of us, like me with over 23+ years of gaming experience with many systems, say C&amp;C is a complete rules system, and is easier to use as a tool kit to modify to your exact tastes.So it wasn't to your or your groups liking, thats fine, but don't tell us you know more about gaming, rules systems, and how well they work, because you don't. C&amp;C doesn't do what you want a system to do, so leave it at that instead of acting liking your an expert about what C&amp;C does or does not do. I played and DMed for almost 5 years and have now run C&amp;C for over two years and I don't claim to be an expert on either system. I run and play either system the way I want to, and C&amp;C is the better of the two at letting me do it the way I like best. All I am an expert is knowing what I want out of my rules systems, C&amp;C does that the best for me. 3E does it best for you. Thats all you need to be saying, instead of turning the statements of posters into meanings you want them to have, or claiming you or your group is more of a game expert than any of us.You don't like C&amp;C, it didn't do anything you wanted it to do, thats all your a qualified expert to tell us about. To claim that your an expert and that the rest of us aren't, and are lying because we are saying things your &quot;expert opinion&quot; says is false, is out of bounds for the rules here on ENWorld. Not to mention giving your meaning to words someone else wrote.You want to do things like that go to other boards where such things are a favored past time. Otherwise post like you do most of the time here on these boards.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Treebore, post: 3927074, member: 10177"] Glad to hear C&C isn't for you, but you don't need to creating insults out of implications you want to take out of them while your telling us this. Those of us, like me with over 23+ years of gaming experience with many systems, say C&C is a complete rules system, and is easier to use as a tool kit to modify to your exact tastes. So it wasn't to your or your groups liking, thats fine, but don't tell us you know more about gaming, rules systems, and how well they work, because you don't. C&C doesn't do what you want a system to do, so leave it at that instead of acting liking your an expert about what C&C does or does not do. I played and DMed for almost 5 years and have now run C&C for over two years and I don't claim to be an expert on either system. I run and play either system the way I want to, and C&C is the better of the two at letting me do it the way I like best. All I am an expert is knowing what I want out of my rules systems, C&C does that the best for me. 3E does it best for you. Thats all you need to be saying, instead of turning the statements of posters into meanings you want them to have, or claiming you or your group is more of a game expert than any of us. You don't like C&C, it didn't do anything you wanted it to do, thats all your a qualified expert to tell us about. To claim that your an expert and that the rest of us aren't, and are lying because we are saying things your "expert opinion" says is false, is out of bounds for the rules here on ENWorld. Not to mention giving your meaning to words someone else wrote. You want to do things like that go to other boards where such things are a favored past time. Otherwise post like you do most of the time here on these boards. [/QUOTE]

Verification