Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Once you go C&C, you never go back
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jim Hague" data-source="post: 3927704" data-attributes="member: 17550"><p>I won't disagree on that point. After playing 3.x for various years - that being the system that brought me back to D&D after leaving the nonsensical prior editions in disgust - I started feeling like improvisation wasn't something the rules encouraged. That's bad for me, since I'm a GM that improvises quite frequently, and 3.x to me is a 'clockwork' system - take a piece out and while it may continue to function, there are consequences. My systems of choice nowadays are Savage Worlds and True20. I haven't strayed far, just enough to satisfy my personal style.</p><p></p><p>On the topic of C&C, I felt like it was a bad combination of toolkit and too <em>much</em> of the old school. While I think prior editions have the lion's share of cool background - Planescape and Ravenloft, f'rex - the handwaving necessary to make the multiple microsystems and contradictory rules work was a pain. Is that a save vs. wands or pertifcation? And why, again? </p><p></p><p>When my group spent a year with various iterations of C&C, the toolkit seemed pretty flexible...except that the gaps it presented required too <em>much</em> handwaving, and the implicit anti-3.x feel of it led to some rules decisions that hearkened back to prior editions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Far too few, in my opinion. Both are barely systems, IMO. For me, a good system has solid, internally consistent rules, ones that don't create an environment where the players are at the pure whim of the GM. </p><p></p><p>Improvisation is good, but it needs a good skeleton to build on...and without that underlying structure, even the best GM is going to trip themselves up eventually, barring the copious taking of notes on every single ruling. That last bit ends up making many 'light' systems fail for a lot of groups I've seen, because the GM ends up having to organize vast binders of arbitrary rulings to keep things consistent. </p><p></p><p>Then again, some groups <em>like</em> that sort of thing. It is, admittedly, very 'old school'. My mileage certainly varied.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jim Hague, post: 3927704, member: 17550"] I won't disagree on that point. After playing 3.x for various years - that being the system that brought me back to D&D after leaving the nonsensical prior editions in disgust - I started feeling like improvisation wasn't something the rules encouraged. That's bad for me, since I'm a GM that improvises quite frequently, and 3.x to me is a 'clockwork' system - take a piece out and while it may continue to function, there are consequences. My systems of choice nowadays are Savage Worlds and True20. I haven't strayed far, just enough to satisfy my personal style. On the topic of C&C, I felt like it was a bad combination of toolkit and too [i]much[/i] of the old school. While I think prior editions have the lion's share of cool background - Planescape and Ravenloft, f'rex - the handwaving necessary to make the multiple microsystems and contradictory rules work was a pain. Is that a save vs. wands or pertifcation? And why, again? When my group spent a year with various iterations of C&C, the toolkit seemed pretty flexible...except that the gaps it presented required too [i]much[/i] handwaving, and the implicit anti-3.x feel of it led to some rules decisions that hearkened back to prior editions. Far too few, in my opinion. Both are barely systems, IMO. For me, a good system has solid, internally consistent rules, ones that don't create an environment where the players are at the pure whim of the GM. Improvisation is good, but it needs a good skeleton to build on...and without that underlying structure, even the best GM is going to trip themselves up eventually, barring the copious taking of notes on every single ruling. That last bit ends up making many 'light' systems fail for a lot of groups I've seen, because the GM ends up having to organize vast binders of arbitrary rulings to keep things consistent. Then again, some groups [i]like[/i] that sort of thing. It is, admittedly, very 'old school'. My mileage certainly varied. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Once you go C&C, you never go back
Top