Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Once you go C&C, you never go back
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dragonhelm" data-source="post: 3928528" data-attributes="member: 3867"><p>Okay, guys, let's ease up here, okay? Obviously, there's a couple of different points of view. I'd really hate for this thread to be closed.</p><p></p><p>I think some of the issues revolve around two different styles of gaming, subjective views, and lack of a standard definition. </p><p></p><p>For example, what makes a "complete" system? Can a game be run with C&C? Yes, and in those regards, it is complete. If your definition includes rules to cover most situations, then no, it may not be complete. Debating whether C&C is a complete system is all subjective, and no two parties will agree on what that definition is.</p><p></p><p>We talk about game balance. I disagree with the assessment that those who want game balance don't trust the DM. What they're striving for is a fair game and consistency. The problem with game balance is that it tends to be too much of a focus. Balance is something to be strived for, but not to the exclusion of the other elements of role-playing. Balance needs to be balanced itself against role-playing, fun, and so on. </p><p></p><p>There are times when rules need to be looked up. No matter what game I play in, I'm always looking up something. I think, though, that people need to keep in mind pacing. The last thing you want at the game table is to have bored players while you look up a rule. If you can find it right away, great. If not, then make a decision and then look it up later and apply it the right way from the next session on. DM adjudication should always be in effect, no matter the system. </p><p></p><p>I think, to be fair, we should also mention modularity. C&C is modular in a sense in that you can add in many different subsystems. Some may need more work than others. Skills, feats, non-weapon proficiencies, etc. are all easy enough to add. But what about psionics, shadow magic, or incarnum? Likewise, the d20 system is pretty modular in that a lot of gaming material out there is designed for d20, and can be used right away without much, if any, adjustment. At the same time, importing non-d20 items can be a bit more tricky.</p><p></p><p>You know, it really is a shame that every time a C&C thread comes along, it becomes so polarized. I guess the "versus" mentality is just part of society. You see it too often. Personally, I'm of the mind that we, as role-players, need to be more respectful of each others' points of view. C&C and D&D fit two different styles of gaming. While one side may not agree with the other, both sides can agree that they like to game. We should, IMO, be supportive of each other, and respect our differences in opinions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dragonhelm, post: 3928528, member: 3867"] Okay, guys, let's ease up here, okay? Obviously, there's a couple of different points of view. I'd really hate for this thread to be closed. I think some of the issues revolve around two different styles of gaming, subjective views, and lack of a standard definition. For example, what makes a "complete" system? Can a game be run with C&C? Yes, and in those regards, it is complete. If your definition includes rules to cover most situations, then no, it may not be complete. Debating whether C&C is a complete system is all subjective, and no two parties will agree on what that definition is. We talk about game balance. I disagree with the assessment that those who want game balance don't trust the DM. What they're striving for is a fair game and consistency. The problem with game balance is that it tends to be too much of a focus. Balance is something to be strived for, but not to the exclusion of the other elements of role-playing. Balance needs to be balanced itself against role-playing, fun, and so on. There are times when rules need to be looked up. No matter what game I play in, I'm always looking up something. I think, though, that people need to keep in mind pacing. The last thing you want at the game table is to have bored players while you look up a rule. If you can find it right away, great. If not, then make a decision and then look it up later and apply it the right way from the next session on. DM adjudication should always be in effect, no matter the system. I think, to be fair, we should also mention modularity. C&C is modular in a sense in that you can add in many different subsystems. Some may need more work than others. Skills, feats, non-weapon proficiencies, etc. are all easy enough to add. But what about psionics, shadow magic, or incarnum? Likewise, the d20 system is pretty modular in that a lot of gaming material out there is designed for d20, and can be used right away without much, if any, adjustment. At the same time, importing non-d20 items can be a bit more tricky. You know, it really is a shame that every time a C&C thread comes along, it becomes so polarized. I guess the "versus" mentality is just part of society. You see it too often. Personally, I'm of the mind that we, as role-players, need to be more respectful of each others' points of view. C&C and D&D fit two different styles of gaming. While one side may not agree with the other, both sides can agree that they like to game. We should, IMO, be supportive of each other, and respect our differences in opinions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Once you go C&C, you never go back
Top