Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
One Column vs Two Columns and other questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HellHound" data-source="post: 2463733" data-attributes="member: 3397"><p>I've taken the time to look over 30 pages of the product in question (the 30 page preview posted)</p><p></p><p>1. The single-column layout -is- very difficult to read. Even in 11-point Times New Roman.</p><p></p><p>2. Chapter 2 starts at the bottoms of the alstpage of chapter 1... well, doesn't actually start, but the TITLE of chapter 2 is there, and then the text of chapter 2 starts on the next page, sans title.</p><p></p><p>3. Although you say that you understand the rule of 2's in another thread, you still have a race in there with a +2 bonus to one stat, 'balanced' by a -1 penalty to two stats... another has +1 to two stats and -1 to two stats.</p><p></p><p>4. The tables are, quite frankly, horrid. here, I'll show a demonstration:</p><p><img src="http://www.nouzuimarketing.com/images/cleric_table.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /> </p><p>- There's really no excuse for the weird table layout for Level, 4th and 9th level spells... On top of that, the tables create large white-spaces in the document where they don't fit on one page and then appear on the next.</p><p></p><p>5. Finally, on to the Open Game License: You do know that anything derived from Open Game Content must in turn be released as open game content, correct? Yet, your OGL statement is that the player character races, mechanics for customizing classes, entire prestige classes, and much more are protexted as PI and are not Open Game Content. Further, you have not referenced the System Reference Document in your Section 15 in accordance with Section 6, which seems strange as there is obviously material in your product that -is- derivative of material in the SRD (unless the races and classes were developed without ever seeing the material from the core d20 rules, in which case I wish to give you credit for blindly developing a cleric class that is much like the one in the core rules and that references the core rules in several places).</p><p></p><p></p><p>That said, if this was laid out properly, edited one more time, and then given to someone with a critical eye for d20 rules and balance, and then given a well-designed cover, I think this might do well as a product...</p><p>---</p><p></p><p>Completely aside: I have balance issues regarding a level 3 clerical spell that deals 1d4 electricity and 1d4 holy damage per caster level to the target (without a damage cap), as well as deafening all within 30 feet of the target (no save vs the deafening)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HellHound, post: 2463733, member: 3397"] I've taken the time to look over 30 pages of the product in question (the 30 page preview posted) 1. The single-column layout -is- very difficult to read. Even in 11-point Times New Roman. 2. Chapter 2 starts at the bottoms of the alstpage of chapter 1... well, doesn't actually start, but the TITLE of chapter 2 is there, and then the text of chapter 2 starts on the next page, sans title. 3. Although you say that you understand the rule of 2's in another thread, you still have a race in there with a +2 bonus to one stat, 'balanced' by a -1 penalty to two stats... another has +1 to two stats and -1 to two stats. 4. The tables are, quite frankly, horrid. here, I'll show a demonstration: [img]http://www.nouzuimarketing.com/images/cleric_table.gif[/img] - There's really no excuse for the weird table layout for Level, 4th and 9th level spells... On top of that, the tables create large white-spaces in the document where they don't fit on one page and then appear on the next. 5. Finally, on to the Open Game License: You do know that anything derived from Open Game Content must in turn be released as open game content, correct? Yet, your OGL statement is that the player character races, mechanics for customizing classes, entire prestige classes, and much more are protexted as PI and are not Open Game Content. Further, you have not referenced the System Reference Document in your Section 15 in accordance with Section 6, which seems strange as there is obviously material in your product that -is- derivative of material in the SRD (unless the races and classes were developed without ever seeing the material from the core d20 rules, in which case I wish to give you credit for blindly developing a cleric class that is much like the one in the core rules and that references the core rules in several places). That said, if this was laid out properly, edited one more time, and then given to someone with a critical eye for d20 rules and balance, and then given a well-designed cover, I think this might do well as a product... --- Completely aside: I have balance issues regarding a level 3 clerical spell that deals 1d4 electricity and 1d4 holy damage per caster level to the target (without a damage cap), as well as deafening all within 30 feet of the target (no save vs the deafening) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
One Column vs Two Columns and other questions
Top