Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
One D&d and alignment: new approach
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marandahir" data-source="post: 8756313" data-attributes="member: 6803643"><p>Remember that Gygax took the Elric style grimdark Order-vs.-Chaos alignment system and tried to expand it into a dual-axis system. But the single-axis origins of the system remained influential: LG was far more defined by "Law" than by "Good." There's a reason that 1977 Basic and 2008 4e had 5 alignments, and B/X, BECMI, RC, and Classic had 3 alignments, again. In the early days, the idea that LE or CG could exist was really difficult to comprehend. 4e tried to return to this idea of a line, where LG is the most lawfully and most goody of good, while CE and NG were really just the same thing (less beholden to the rules but otherwise good), LE is really just the same thing as NE (evil but not destructively so), and CE is the most destructively evil of all.</p><p></p><p>Gygax associated Order and Good with each other, even after he acknowledged that CG and LE could potentially exist. So if the Laws exist, and the Laws say Orcs must be destroyed, it must be good to destroy Orcs, right? That's the sort of extremism that happens when you go down that rabbit hole of putting Law above Goodness. But the original Paladin was definitely LAWFUL good, not lawful GOOD. Good was always in service to law, and being lawful and not good was okay, but being good and not lawful was blasphemous. </p><p></p><p>Thank HEIRONEOUS that's no longer the case, and alignment is not a straight jacket. We can tell stories of Daredevil-ike Paladins that skirt the line of their faith and wrestle with whether their acts are truly good, whether they go far enough, or whether they've gone a step too far. </p><p></p><p>Honestly, in my mind, if you want to play a Paladin with atonement rules and internal struggles of what to do when, take a watch of Marvel's Daredevil show (previously on Netflix, now on D+). Given that Matt Murdock is a LAWYER by day and a non-killing-but-quite-violent vigilante by night (not to mention one with Blind Fighting, because Justice is Blind), who goes to church to confess his sins to his priest because he struggles with whether he's doing the right thing or not by beating up criminals and taking the law into his own hands - I'd say he's the perfect example of a LG Paladin.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marandahir, post: 8756313, member: 6803643"] Remember that Gygax took the Elric style grimdark Order-vs.-Chaos alignment system and tried to expand it into a dual-axis system. But the single-axis origins of the system remained influential: LG was far more defined by "Law" than by "Good." There's a reason that 1977 Basic and 2008 4e had 5 alignments, and B/X, BECMI, RC, and Classic had 3 alignments, again. In the early days, the idea that LE or CG could exist was really difficult to comprehend. 4e tried to return to this idea of a line, where LG is the most lawfully and most goody of good, while CE and NG were really just the same thing (less beholden to the rules but otherwise good), LE is really just the same thing as NE (evil but not destructively so), and CE is the most destructively evil of all. Gygax associated Order and Good with each other, even after he acknowledged that CG and LE could potentially exist. So if the Laws exist, and the Laws say Orcs must be destroyed, it must be good to destroy Orcs, right? That's the sort of extremism that happens when you go down that rabbit hole of putting Law above Goodness. But the original Paladin was definitely LAWFUL good, not lawful GOOD. Good was always in service to law, and being lawful and not good was okay, but being good and not lawful was blasphemous. Thank HEIRONEOUS that's no longer the case, and alignment is not a straight jacket. We can tell stories of Daredevil-ike Paladins that skirt the line of their faith and wrestle with whether their acts are truly good, whether they go far enough, or whether they've gone a step too far. Honestly, in my mind, if you want to play a Paladin with atonement rules and internal struggles of what to do when, take a watch of Marvel's Daredevil show (previously on Netflix, now on D+). Given that Matt Murdock is a LAWYER by day and a non-killing-but-quite-violent vigilante by night (not to mention one with Blind Fighting, because Justice is Blind), who goes to church to confess his sins to his priest because he struggles with whether he's doing the right thing or not by beating up criminals and taking the law into his own hands - I'd say he's the perfect example of a LG Paladin. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
One D&d and alignment: new approach
Top