Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
One D&D Survey Feedback: Weapon Mastery Spectacular; Warlock and Wizard Mixed Reactions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 9093264" data-attributes="member: 6750235"><p>You're right, no one is taking versatile because of the off chance they might lose their shield. Versatile comes into play in that situational instance when they are sword and board and coincidently lose the shield. The versatile property is more of a ribbon in that scenario.</p><p></p><p>People do use versatile when they cannot use a shield in the first place for whatever reason. Monk is an example. Many spellcasters who might be in a silence area or antimagic area forced to melee are going to use versatile as a situational benefit. Or a low level bard (simple weapons) down to vicious mockery and looking for some damage. Situationally something that helps.</p><p></p><p>The longsword vs rapier point is a criticism of the longsword and not representative of versatile. Not every character who might melee has access to those weapons. Versatile does add damage over a rapier with flex when the other hand is holding a shield or another weapon (using the dual wielder feat), however. Vex only works when advantage doesn't already exist. At that point it's nothing.</p><p></p><p>If there's another source of advantage vex is pointless. Once an opponent is toppled that opponent cannot be further toppled. Once an opponent is slowed that opponent cannot be further slowed. Once an opponent is sapped that opponent cannot be further sapped. Push is restricted by size. Even nick is pointless for someone using TWF if there's no option to use that bonus action. Flex with versatile always adds damage.</p><p></p><p>A 13th level fighter can use topple and flex with a long sword, topple an opponent, and then attack with d10's on the prone opponent. That fighter cannot prone the same opponent twice while prone applies the benefits of vex and sap as part of the condition so flex works with that combo.</p><p></p><p>Versatility isn't just for fighters (monks make the most use of it), and flex as a secondary to topple isn't a poor choice. If the long sword is giving a d12 on flex what's the point of a battle axe or great sword at that point? Most fighters are going to have the same damage plus the AC bonus from a shield at that point and take dueling style.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 9093264, member: 6750235"] You're right, no one is taking versatile because of the off chance they might lose their shield. Versatile comes into play in that situational instance when they are sword and board and coincidently lose the shield. The versatile property is more of a ribbon in that scenario. People do use versatile when they cannot use a shield in the first place for whatever reason. Monk is an example. Many spellcasters who might be in a silence area or antimagic area forced to melee are going to use versatile as a situational benefit. Or a low level bard (simple weapons) down to vicious mockery and looking for some damage. Situationally something that helps. The longsword vs rapier point is a criticism of the longsword and not representative of versatile. Not every character who might melee has access to those weapons. Versatile does add damage over a rapier with flex when the other hand is holding a shield or another weapon (using the dual wielder feat), however. Vex only works when advantage doesn't already exist. At that point it's nothing. If there's another source of advantage vex is pointless. Once an opponent is toppled that opponent cannot be further toppled. Once an opponent is slowed that opponent cannot be further slowed. Once an opponent is sapped that opponent cannot be further sapped. Push is restricted by size. Even nick is pointless for someone using TWF if there's no option to use that bonus action. Flex with versatile always adds damage. A 13th level fighter can use topple and flex with a long sword, topple an opponent, and then attack with d10's on the prone opponent. That fighter cannot prone the same opponent twice while prone applies the benefits of vex and sap as part of the condition so flex works with that combo. Versatility isn't just for fighters (monks make the most use of it), and flex as a secondary to topple isn't a poor choice. If the long sword is giving a d12 on flex what's the point of a battle axe or great sword at that point? Most fighters are going to have the same damage plus the AC bonus from a shield at that point and take dueling style. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
One D&D Survey Feedback: Weapon Mastery Spectacular; Warlock and Wizard Mixed Reactions
Top