Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9116166" data-attributes="member: 2525">So all members are participating in a rest spell. The purpose of the spell is for the entire party to rest, the spell can't really even be used if the party doesn't agree on a rest, and the decision to use it therefore is a party decision.As for it only being "valid" if the party has "equal resources" to contribute, I don't even know what that means. If the rogue is checking for traps, that isn't using a resource but it's the same sort of value. It's a BAD thing for the spellcaster that they have to burn a resource that's effectively a party resource when many others do not have to burn a resource to help the party in a similar thing, not a benefit (unless you're casting the spell as a ritual, in which case it's as neutral as the rogue checking for traps). Again, the only benefit it would be is if it were a spotlight issue - which it's not. There is nothing to role play about tiny hut. And yes I know what the topic is, but the entire reason we're talking about out of combat spells is because of this spotlight claim. "I don't like this spell" isn't really about that right? I mean you could purge a bunch of the out of combat spells you don't like and if there is some spotlight issue with out of combat spells it will remain I assume just as much an issue. So what is the point of bringing up "I don't like some spells" in the conversation?</blockquote>