Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9116312" data-attributes="member: 2525">In what way are the different for this example? See this is why I keep asking for examples where it's meaningful. There is ZERO difference between telling them DM you cast the tiny hut spell and marking it off on your character sheet, and benefitting from the spell, in this instance. Because the &quot;participating&quot; part IS THE SPOTLIGHT ISSUE. It's the role playing issue I mentioned. That's what &quot;participating&quot; means for a game like this. There is zero satisfaction from just making a check on your character sheet that you're the one who used a resource for this, for this kind of spell. There is no interaction involved. It's the same level of &quot;participation&quot; as saying &quot;I get my pack out,&quot; for this kind of scenario.I am using it correctly, and I don't appreciate you making it personal. This has nothing to do with what I want to have &quot;catered to&quot; (I play a Rogue most of the time!) and I am not trying to &quot;fast talk&quot; anyone by discussing the actual issue with examples as opposed to the hypothesis which I believe doesn't hold up to tests.What meaningful &quot;participation&quot; do you think is involved here? Articulate whatever you think is apparent in this scenario concerning participation?That's meaningless for this scenario if there isn't meaning to the action for the spellcaster in the first place beyond the same meaning it has for the rest of the party.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 9116312, member: 2525"] In what way are the different for this example? See this is why I keep asking for examples where it's meaningful. There is ZERO difference between telling them DM you cast the tiny hut spell and marking it off on your character sheet, and benefitting from the spell, in this instance. Because the "participating" part IS THE SPOTLIGHT ISSUE. It's the role playing issue I mentioned. That's what "participating" means for a game like this. There is zero satisfaction from just making a check on your character sheet that you're the one who used a resource for this, for this kind of spell. There is no interaction involved. It's the same level of "participation" as saying "I get my pack out," for this kind of scenario. I am using it correctly, and I don't appreciate you making it personal. This has nothing to do with what I want to have "catered to" (I play a Rogue most of the time!) and I am not trying to "fast talk" anyone by discussing the actual issue with examples as opposed to the hypothesis which I believe doesn't hold up to tests. What meaningful "participation" do you think is involved here? Articulate whatever you think is apparent in this scenario concerning participation? That's meaningless for this scenario if there isn't meaning to the action for the spellcaster in the first place beyond the same meaning it has for the rest of the party. [/QUOTE]

Verification