Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
One Early RoboCop Reaction Calls The Remake Better Than The Original
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Homicidal_Squirrel" data-source="post: 6262954" data-attributes="member: 6750031"><p>The movie had potential, but it just didn't deliver. It felt as if they should have developed their ideas better but instead, they rushed it, and gave us a weak product that while entertaining on the shoot 'em up part, didn't have much else going for it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[sblock=Respose]</p><p>Gary Oldman's character had potential, but he wasn't developed enough. The transformation from carring doctor to company man, to redeemed scientist was far too quick, and there really was't much conflict. He just did things because he wanted to. [/sblock]</p><p></p><p></p><p>[sblock=Response]</p><p>I've read these studies. The basic idea is that your brain has made the choice before you are aware of that choice. I liked that the movie took this part on. The doctor made changes to Robocop's brain chips, and he explained that the program made the choices and then sent these signals to Robocop's brain to make him think that this was a choice that he had made. This had great potential, but I really think they screwed it up by making him rewrite the programing with his "emotions." That just killed it.[/sblock]</p><p></p><p></p><p>[sblock=Response]</p><p>First, I have to admit I was very disappointed with the new ED209s. They seemed so easily destroyed, and underused. They didn't appear as a competing product, as the originals did. I know, the new humanoid robots were supposed to be the competing product, but they weren't. The ls in the movie took them out. They were only really used at the start of the movie, and in the training scenes. The original ED209s played the role of the competing, yet flawed product, much better. </p><p></p><p>As for Sam Jackson, and his show, I did like that, but again, underdeveloped. It was a funny parody of a Fox News style show, and a decent way to comment on the media' ability to influence the public, but they just didn't do much with it. I mean, who was Sam Jackson's character? Was he in collusion with Keaton's character? Why was he so interested in drones being on U.S. street? He just seems like an extra that has a few lines. He had amazing potential, but they just didn't bother to do much with it.[/sblock]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Homicidal_Squirrel, post: 6262954, member: 6750031"] The movie had potential, but it just didn't deliver. It felt as if they should have developed their ideas better but instead, they rushed it, and gave us a weak product that while entertaining on the shoot 'em up part, didn't have much else going for it. [sblock=Respose] Gary Oldman's character had potential, but he wasn't developed enough. The transformation from carring doctor to company man, to redeemed scientist was far too quick, and there really was't much conflict. He just did things because he wanted to. [/sblock] [sblock=Response] I've read these studies. The basic idea is that your brain has made the choice before you are aware of that choice. I liked that the movie took this part on. The doctor made changes to Robocop's brain chips, and he explained that the program made the choices and then sent these signals to Robocop's brain to make him think that this was a choice that he had made. This had great potential, but I really think they screwed it up by making him rewrite the programing with his "emotions." That just killed it.[/sblock] [sblock=Response] First, I have to admit I was very disappointed with the new ED209s. They seemed so easily destroyed, and underused. They didn't appear as a competing product, as the originals did. I know, the new humanoid robots were supposed to be the competing product, but they weren't. The ls in the movie took them out. They were only really used at the start of the movie, and in the training scenes. The original ED209s played the role of the competing, yet flawed product, much better. As for Sam Jackson, and his show, I did like that, but again, underdeveloped. It was a funny parody of a Fox News style show, and a decent way to comment on the media' ability to influence the public, but they just didn't do much with it. I mean, who was Sam Jackson's character? Was he in collusion with Keaton's character? Why was he so interested in drones being on U.S. street? He just seems like an extra that has a few lines. He had amazing potential, but they just didn't bother to do much with it.[/sblock] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
One Early RoboCop Reaction Calls The Remake Better Than The Original
Top