Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bloodstone Press" data-source="post: 2722496" data-attributes="member: 12468">I've done a lot of one on one games in the past. I would say that they depend a great deal on the chemistry between the DM and the player. As long as they are both on the same page, the game should go well. &nbsp; I've got one player in particular that I love to game with in one on one sessions because he's a great role-player and he's the luckiest person I've ever met in my life. He's great at playing a hero and he likes a lot of the same themes and ideas that I like. &nbsp;On the other hand, I've gamed in one on one sessions with people that just didn't have the same skill or talent. They weren't proactive enough and were afraid to take chances. And so the game was quite mediocre. It also depends a lot on the player, since there won’t be anyone else there to help him or her out. &nbsp;From a game design point of view, you need to be careful about encounters and challenge ratings, of course.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bloodstone Press, post: 2722496, member: 12468"] I've done a lot of one on one games in the past. I would say that they depend a great deal on the chemistry between the DM and the player. As long as they are both on the same page, the game should go well. I've got one player in particular that I love to game with in one on one sessions because he's a great role-player and he's the luckiest person I've ever met in my life. He's great at playing a hero and he likes a lot of the same themes and ideas that I like. On the other hand, I've gamed in one on one sessions with people that just didn't have the same skill or talent. They weren't proactive enough and were afraid to take chances. And so the game was quite mediocre. It also depends a lot on the player, since there won’t be anyone else there to help him or her out. From a game design point of view, you need to be careful about encounters and challenge ratings, of course. [/QUOTE]

Verification