Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
One or Two Themes for Each Character?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 5952279" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>I wouldn't have a problem with the Fighter getting two themes to start with, under the assumption that the "second theme" comes from a finite class list of eligible Fighter themes-- the same way the Rogue seems to be getting an analogous "second background" via the Rogue Scheme ability.</p><p></p><p>Until character creation is made available we won't know for sure... but it appears (based on what we've heard thus far) that perhaps Rogue Schemes are simply a second Background a rogue gets to take... but only those that are more "roguish" based. So the Thief obviously... the Charlatan I remember being mentioned. Perhaps the Pirate. Ones like that. Backgrounds that fall outside of the roguish ones... (Priest, Knight etc.) would still be available for the rogue to take in their primary Background slot... but just not in their secondary Scheme slot.</p><p></p><p>Fighters might very well be the same way using themes.</p><p></p><p>You have your large list of themes that are available for everybody to take in their primary Theme slot, regardless of class. So for instance, your Fighter could take the Magic-User theme and have a bit of extra magical ability. But perhaps then <em>also</em> as a class feature, the Fighter gets to choose a second theme (call it the Fighter Exploit)... but these <em>have</em> to come from a designated Exploit list that is much more fighter-focused... Slayer, Guardian, Dual-Wielder, Skirmisher, Sharpshooter, Tactician etc. Just like Schemes are the more "roguish" backgrounds... Exploits are the more "fighterish" themes.</p><p></p><p>What you get is a guarantee that even if a player wants their Fighter to go "against type" by taking a theme like Magic-User... that player ALSO will get to have a more fighter-centric one as well so that the PC can still effectively do his job as a Fighter better.</p><p></p><p>And really, it makes sense. Rogues always had more skills than any other class, and giving them a second background accomplishes that. Fighters in 3E always had more feats than any other class, and giving them a second theme accomplishes that as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 5952279, member: 7006"] I wouldn't have a problem with the Fighter getting two themes to start with, under the assumption that the "second theme" comes from a finite class list of eligible Fighter themes-- the same way the Rogue seems to be getting an analogous "second background" via the Rogue Scheme ability. Until character creation is made available we won't know for sure... but it appears (based on what we've heard thus far) that perhaps Rogue Schemes are simply a second Background a rogue gets to take... but only those that are more "roguish" based. So the Thief obviously... the Charlatan I remember being mentioned. Perhaps the Pirate. Ones like that. Backgrounds that fall outside of the roguish ones... (Priest, Knight etc.) would still be available for the rogue to take in their primary Background slot... but just not in their secondary Scheme slot. Fighters might very well be the same way using themes. You have your large list of themes that are available for everybody to take in their primary Theme slot, regardless of class. So for instance, your Fighter could take the Magic-User theme and have a bit of extra magical ability. But perhaps then [I]also[/I] as a class feature, the Fighter gets to choose a second theme (call it the Fighter Exploit)... but these [I]have[/I] to come from a designated Exploit list that is much more fighter-focused... Slayer, Guardian, Dual-Wielder, Skirmisher, Sharpshooter, Tactician etc. Just like Schemes are the more "roguish" backgrounds... Exploits are the more "fighterish" themes. What you get is a guarantee that even if a player wants their Fighter to go "against type" by taking a theme like Magic-User... that player ALSO will get to have a more fighter-centric one as well so that the PC can still effectively do his job as a Fighter better. And really, it makes sense. Rogues always had more skills than any other class, and giving them a second background accomplishes that. Fighters in 3E always had more feats than any other class, and giving them a second theme accomplishes that as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
One or Two Themes for Each Character?
Top