Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
One setting per year?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cyronax" data-source="post: 3922709" data-attributes="member: 822"><p>Yeah I agree totally. It goes back to the point about segmentation and knowing how to adapt to it. </p><p></p><p>Look at Ptolus for example ..... as far I understand, its a great setting that is very expensive, but delivers a lot to a few. Its a niche setting for people that usually frequent EN World, more than say Wotc's sites exclusively. </p><p></p><p>And back to the point that TSR didn't care about their customers ...... I'd say this is accurate. </p><p></p><p>I remember reading messages from Gary Holian, Erik Mona, and all of the self-described 'old guard' of Greyhawk on AOL in the mid-90s. They were often bitter and railed against TSR constantly about the path that GH took.</p><p></p><p>Wotc comes along and BAM, GH is reborn into several awesome late-2e products, and will become the default setting for the core books and many adventures in DUNGEON magazine. </p><p>Also don't forget Living Greyhawk, which essentially keeps GH alive. </p><p></p><p>That said, I think Wotc deserves credit for really doing what they can to appeal to a number of fan bases. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, I'm rambling, but the end point is that I think Wotc understands the situation they've created with 4e better than many on these boards give them credit for. </p><p></p><p>They did a pretty good job with 3e, despite some criticisms, and they also helped create a market for innovation using a common mechanic for rules. </p><p></p><p>Done rambling.</p><p></p><p>C.I.D.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cyronax, post: 3922709, member: 822"] Yeah I agree totally. It goes back to the point about segmentation and knowing how to adapt to it. Look at Ptolus for example ..... as far I understand, its a great setting that is very expensive, but delivers a lot to a few. Its a niche setting for people that usually frequent EN World, more than say Wotc's sites exclusively. And back to the point that TSR didn't care about their customers ...... I'd say this is accurate. I remember reading messages from Gary Holian, Erik Mona, and all of the self-described 'old guard' of Greyhawk on AOL in the mid-90s. They were often bitter and railed against TSR constantly about the path that GH took. Wotc comes along and BAM, GH is reborn into several awesome late-2e products, and will become the default setting for the core books and many adventures in DUNGEON magazine. Also don't forget Living Greyhawk, which essentially keeps GH alive. That said, I think Wotc deserves credit for really doing what they can to appeal to a number of fan bases. Anyway, I'm rambling, but the end point is that I think Wotc understands the situation they've created with 4e better than many on these boards give them credit for. They did a pretty good job with 3e, despite some criticisms, and they also helped create a market for innovation using a common mechanic for rules. Done rambling. C.I.D. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
One setting per year?
Top