Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crimson Longinus" data-source="post: 9313925" data-attributes="member: 7025508">No.Previously the writers had to write 17 subclasses , not they can cover the same ground with twelve, leaving them time, if they're so inclined, to cover five more concepts with the same amount of work. Not to mention the saved time for not having to write the additional bas class chassis.No. This combined class doesn't need to follow the current warlock subclass structure exactly; aftercall, we are intentionally broadening things so that we can represent more concepts. Daron pact would still have its dragons stuff, though some of it might be take a form of dragon-themed invocations.It's not. Spreading things too thin makes both thematics and rules strained, and we end up with things with confused fluff like current warlock and sorcerer and classes whose mechanics are lacklustre as the design space was too crowded like the current sorcerer, or too inflexible like the current warlock.</blockquote>