Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9314926" data-attributes="member: 6801228">So... we are going to erase the sorcerer class, because the warlock doesn't explain how making a pact for magical powers gives you magical powers? Vague is not incoherent. Warlock fluff is not incoherent AT ALL.It does. I don't understand how you think the warlock does not answer the question of what a warlock metaphysically is. It is vague, yes, but that is a function of encompassing many different variations on the same theme, not because it is incoherent.So, don't erase the sorcerer by combining them with the warlock? Or do you think being a warlock with a contractual obligation to a greater power somehow covers being born cursed with powers because you were forced to live in an arcane wasteland? Or are we know just talking about changing the mechanics of sorcerer (the thing you didn't want) and just changing them to match the warlock? Or are we going to veer again into another argument that doesn't match either of those?</blockquote>