Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ahnehnois" data-source="post: 5783208" data-attributes="member: 17106">The classic D&D stuff: The Great Wheel and its inhabitants was developed wonderfully over the years. The Demon/Devil/Yugoloth paradigm especially. There are a lot of things there that aren't broken and didn't need to be fixed. Of course, that goes in tandem with the nine alignments, which also need to be returned.The succubi thing is really strange. A really well-played succubus was a total anarchist and a psychopath, and incredibly terrifying. Why change one of the most popular demons?I would also like to see a true set of dragon races in its own book rather than trying to shoehorn one into the core rules. And the return of the Dragonborn concept.Wait, what? They may not be quite as ubiquitous as the evil outsiders, but I think a large portion of gamers-and certainly most anyone who reads monster books-would recognize that guardinals, archons, and eladrin are the three alignment-based subspecies of celestials. They're probably as well known or better than many other classic extraplanar species: rilmani, modrons, slaadi, formians, etc. Why steal the name for a bunch of teleporting elves? Can't they just be called something else, something more appropriate?(That is, if you like teleporting elves).</blockquote>