D&D (2024) OneDnD, playtesting and DnDBeyond

[Whizbang Dustyboots]

I don’t use DNDB myself but why would they code in temporary playtest material?

Especially since they haven't implemented some of the content from Tasha's.

 

[fluffybunbunkittens]

Especially since they haven't implemented some of the content from Tasha's.

Oh? What's missing?

 

[Whizbang Dustyboots]

Oh? What's missing?

Sidekick classes, which WotC insisted should be used as player classes. I use them a lot in my campaigns for NPCs, but I'd use a lot more of them if I could actually make them in D&D Beyond, even if I was limited to PC races, rather than war dogs and the like.

Also missing are their Extra Life Muk books, which include a new goblin subrace, the Dankwood Goblin, and are expressly intended to be used for young players' PCs.

If WotC has really staffed up D&D Beyond, as we have been told, it'd be nice to get some clarity about what they're doing.

 

[fluffybunbunkittens]

Sidekick classes
Dankwood Goblin

Oh, right! I'd heard about those, and then never saw them!

Wait, sidekick wizard still needs to pick individual spells, what is this nonsense.

 

[bedir than]

Sidekick classes, which WotC insisted should be used as player classes. I use them a lot in my campaigns for NPCs, but I'd use a lot more of them if I could actually make them in D&D Beyond, even if I was limited to PC races, rather than war dogs and the like.

These are really, really handy for social campaigns!