Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[ONLINE] Pathfinder: Worlds Largest Dungeon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 5156178" data-attributes="member: 35909"><p>I think it'd have the opposite effect. With that setup, everyone who's indecisive would just skip their turns anyway at best. At worst, you could have someone who wants to actually do something but then has to wait for every single other player to reply "not doing much," which can be lengthy in an online game where people often go "mini afk" for small amounts of time when not much is going on.</p><p></p><p>That said, whenever we get into a situation with NPCs where there's any chance of combat breaking out, I'm in favor of doing initiative right away. I hate it when before a fight people just start shouting off all the actions they want to take to buff or use diplomacy or get in the first attack (an aggressive intent is actually what should trigger init, if nothing else. Just because you want to go first doesn't mean you're going to be the first one "on the draw.") A PC or one of the NPCs seems eager to start mixing it up? Roll init. If the aggressive one can go first, he'll probably start a fight, whether his friends agree or not (of course, if he has to move past an ally, they might be able to use an AoO to grab and restrain him). If the diplomat goes first, maybe he tries a rushed diplomacy to make them friendly. Whatever.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 5156178, member: 35909"] I think it'd have the opposite effect. With that setup, everyone who's indecisive would just skip their turns anyway at best. At worst, you could have someone who wants to actually do something but then has to wait for every single other player to reply "not doing much," which can be lengthy in an online game where people often go "mini afk" for small amounts of time when not much is going on. That said, whenever we get into a situation with NPCs where there's any chance of combat breaking out, I'm in favor of doing initiative right away. I hate it when before a fight people just start shouting off all the actions they want to take to buff or use diplomacy or get in the first attack (an aggressive intent is actually what should trigger init, if nothing else. Just because you want to go first doesn't mean you're going to be the first one "on the draw.") A PC or one of the NPCs seems eager to start mixing it up? Roll init. If the aggressive one can go first, he'll probably start a fight, whether his friends agree or not (of course, if he has to move past an ally, they might be able to use an AoO to grab and restrain him). If the diplomat goes first, maybe he tries a rushed diplomacy to make them friendly. Whatever. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[ONLINE] Pathfinder: Worlds Largest Dungeon
Top