Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
OOC: Adventure Path - Shackled City
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Krago o'the Mountain" data-source="post: 2581456" data-attributes="member: 34882"><p>Ugh, I'll take the blame on this one, Dichotomy. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek! :o" data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" /> </p><p></p><p>I guess I just made some assumptions that proved not to be valid. So, here are some basics about how we'll run combat.</p><p></p><p>When you guys get into a scrape, I'll first establish an initiative order. Then, you just need to let me know what your character's intentions are, using as many conditional qualifiers as you feel are relevant/appropriate.</p><p></p><p>For example: "Tordek will attack the orc with his waraxe until the brute falls, then move on to the next closest enemy and continue the assault. If he falls below 10 hp, he'll withdraw and move adjacent to Jozan in hopes of healing."</p><p></p><p>Now, obviously, there are plenty of unexpected occurences that might happen (an enemy spellcaster might cast a spell, new enemies enter the combat, etc.) which could disrupt those plans. If they do, I'll pause the action and ask for a new intended course of action. Still, these types of posts help me resolve combats faster, because they do give me a general idea of what your character wants to do.</p><p></p><p>I should also mention that this method of combat resolution works better at low levels, because there are fewer likely actions that a given character will take. At higher levels the combat becomes so complex that it really has to be resolved round by round.</p><p></p><p>In any case, there is no need to wait for another character (or enemy) to post his/her actions for a given round. Once I know everyone's intentions, I'll put it all together into a (hopefully) cohesive whole. If I see a sensible course of action that doesn't deviate radically from the PCs intent, and presents no serious drawbacks, I'll take the liberty (as I did in moving William to negate the skulk's cover advantage....in a face to face game, I assume Scotley would have done the same once he was reminded of that fact).</p><p></p><p>Well, that was long and rambly, but I hope it helps. Please let me know if there are any other questions.</p><p></p><p>-Krago</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Krago o'the Mountain, post: 2581456, member: 34882"] Ugh, I'll take the blame on this one, Dichotomy. :o I guess I just made some assumptions that proved not to be valid. So, here are some basics about how we'll run combat. When you guys get into a scrape, I'll first establish an initiative order. Then, you just need to let me know what your character's intentions are, using as many conditional qualifiers as you feel are relevant/appropriate. For example: "Tordek will attack the orc with his waraxe until the brute falls, then move on to the next closest enemy and continue the assault. If he falls below 10 hp, he'll withdraw and move adjacent to Jozan in hopes of healing." Now, obviously, there are plenty of unexpected occurences that might happen (an enemy spellcaster might cast a spell, new enemies enter the combat, etc.) which could disrupt those plans. If they do, I'll pause the action and ask for a new intended course of action. Still, these types of posts help me resolve combats faster, because they do give me a general idea of what your character wants to do. I should also mention that this method of combat resolution works better at low levels, because there are fewer likely actions that a given character will take. At higher levels the combat becomes so complex that it really has to be resolved round by round. In any case, there is no need to wait for another character (or enemy) to post his/her actions for a given round. Once I know everyone's intentions, I'll put it all together into a (hopefully) cohesive whole. If I see a sensible course of action that doesn't deviate radically from the PCs intent, and presents no serious drawbacks, I'll take the liberty (as I did in moving William to negate the skulk's cover advantage....in a face to face game, I assume Scotley would have done the same once he was reminded of that fact). Well, that was long and rambly, but I hope it helps. Please let me know if there are any other questions. -Krago [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
OOC: Adventure Path - Shackled City
Top