NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kinem" data-source="post: 4464247" data-attributes="member: 24234">It's been fun.  Thanks for running a good game, Graf.I don't know - I'll consider making a L4W character.  If we were continuing with new characters to avenge the TPK in this game, I'd make a dwarven warlock with the ranger multiclass feat - Brock's cousin, going to avenge him.I played this game because I wanted to try 4e, not just condemn it without having any experience with it.I'm still no fan of 4e and I still eagerly await the next edition which I hope will fix 3.5's many horrible flaws.  The only step in that direction right now is Pathfinder and that does hold out some promise as it's working well so far in the face to face game I'm in.Things I don't like about 4e: minions, marking, martial dailies, the lack of spells that actually do anything (OK there are a few - they're called rituals, but they have expensive material components and can't be cast in combat, and I predict no PC will ever cast one in the history of 4e play except for Raise Dead and Remove Disease), NPCs not built on the same rules as PCs (well - not built on any rules at all really, just ask Irontooth), healing surges, the huge # of hp that monsters have, the XP-based encounter design system (no more accurate than the CR system was - witness the TPK  - but more work) ... Well, you get the idea.BUT - I do think it's a good system for B'n'P gaming!  It can be quick 'n' dirty, just fine for conventions or impromptu games.Anyway - good group, and it can be a change of pace, so I'll consider joining <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification