Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Isida Kep'Tukari" data-source="post: 1988419" data-attributes="member: 4441">Ok, here we go:  First off, none of these people are as powerful as you are.  That's clear.   Though you don't know these warriors by name, the armor and swords are clearly of the queen's elite guard.  They are well-trained, and skilled at cutting the cords of life.  Their swords can actually dissociate someone from their body so that the cord can be cut.  They are the weakest of the lot.  Kressi'keth and Ill'kadar, skilled arcanists.  Kressi'keth is actually a battle mage of some small noteriety on the planes, for he is skilled in strategy.  He is probably the most dangerous.  Ill'kadar is diviner, and skilled at cutting through magical illusions.  However, she is quite less powerful than Kressi'keth.  Of these two you know far less of.  The psions have far less free will than the arcanists in the githyanki.  These two, judging by the blank look in their eyes, are nothing more than husks of power for the queen to inhabit at will.  They are her puppets, and her way to keep a close eye on the proceedings.  Shel'gyth, the Destroyer of a Thousand Souls.  She is a ranger of great skill, with a great hatred for many races, illithids and humans being her prime foes.  Next to Kressi'keth, she is the biggest danger.  Mal'wygn, the Ghost Warrior.  One of the rare githyanki monks, he was trained to infiltrat the githzeri strongholds.  Though cunning, he is far less dangerous than Shel'gyth.  Qu'var, Silver Tongue of the Queen.  He is one of her few diplomats, very skilled in telling other races how to submit to the githyanki in such a way they are eager to do it.  He knows this is the most prestigeous assignment he has ever been given, and his life is forfit if he fails.  He is working under a death threat, which seems to make githyanki work harder and better.  He is not much of a warrior, but his tongue is weapon enough for many.</blockquote>

Verification