Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
(OOC) Scourge of Daggerford (Full)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Stew" data-source="post: 9499565" data-attributes="member: 23484"><p> <table style='width: 100%'><tr><td></td><td><br /> I'm not sure how to respond to this, but I will try.<br /> <br /> This is not the first time you have criticized my play, but it is the first time in this game that I can think of someone has stopped an action of another player. When I play face-to-face, this would be unthinkable, but I accept not every table is the same, and we don't have the benefit of fellowship or comraderie. However, you also had the opportunity to post in the ooc, and you chose not to. <br /> <br /> It appears to me that you are confusing me for my character. Tommi is impulsive, but I am not, and I think I was pretty slow to act. I'll offer support for both halves of that sentence.<br /> <br /> * First, check out his character sheet: "Personality: happy go lucky. I've always got by so far. Odds are I will tomorrow as well. ... Flaw: A sleeping bear? I should poke it." This choice should not be a surprise to you.<br /> <br /> * On October 18 Tommi turned to the group and asked for discussion (asking the fiend "Maybe you can just give us a sec?"). Almost everyone weighed in. Twelve days later, someone else in the group nudged us to take action, so I posted an action for Tommi. You reacted to that post, on Wednesday, and said nothing. I have posted once since then (drawing out the action, recognizing it was controversial) and three days later you have responded. I took your "wow" reaction and subsequent silence as acceptance. I really do not believe I was rushing anything.<br /> <br /> You ask for OOC discussion. Yes, Let's.<br /> <br /> I am saying the characters should try to break the rod, and anyone who wants should be at a safe distance. I have no idea what the result will be, or if it's possible. But I feel that choice both advances the story and keeps the group central in the action, which giving it away does not. It also seems true to Tommi. I further believe we are ill-equipped to negotiate with a devil. <br /> <br /> An alternative (the one Tommi would think of if it doesn't break) would be to try to bury it or hide it so that it can be never found again. But it would be us (the characters) doing it, on our own, and it would not involve bringing a partially-captive Pit Fiend back to a community, which does not seem to me either wise or kind (both of which I feel characterize Tommi).<br /> <br /> Lunn would be a natural person to try to break the rod with Tommi, and we could Help each other, but it would put Lunn in the blast radius I am imagining (as I described in a subsequent post, 3531).<br /> <br /> Let's discuss.<br /> <br /> </td></tr></table></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Stew, post: 9499565, member: 23484"] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD] I'm not sure how to respond to this, but I will try. This is not the first time you have criticized my play, but it is the first time in this game that I can think of someone has stopped an action of another player. When I play face-to-face, this would be unthinkable, but I accept not every table is the same, and we don't have the benefit of fellowship or comraderie. However, you also had the opportunity to post in the ooc, and you chose not to. It appears to me that you are confusing me for my character. Tommi is impulsive, but I am not, and I think I was pretty slow to act. I'll offer support for both halves of that sentence. * First, check out his character sheet: "Personality: happy go lucky. I've always got by so far. Odds are I will tomorrow as well. ... Flaw: A sleeping bear? I should poke it." This choice should not be a surprise to you. * On October 18 Tommi turned to the group and asked for discussion (asking the fiend "Maybe you can just give us a sec?"). Almost everyone weighed in. Twelve days later, someone else in the group nudged us to take action, so I posted an action for Tommi. You reacted to that post, on Wednesday, and said nothing. I have posted once since then (drawing out the action, recognizing it was controversial) and three days later you have responded. I took your "wow" reaction and subsequent silence as acceptance. I really do not believe I was rushing anything. You ask for OOC discussion. Yes, Let's. I am saying the characters should try to break the rod, and anyone who wants should be at a safe distance. I have no idea what the result will be, or if it's possible. But I feel that choice both advances the story and keeps the group central in the action, which giving it away does not. It also seems true to Tommi. I further believe we are ill-equipped to negotiate with a devil. An alternative (the one Tommi would think of if it doesn't break) would be to try to bury it or hide it so that it can be never found again. But it would be us (the characters) doing it, on our own, and it would not involve bringing a partially-captive Pit Fiend back to a community, which does not seem to me either wise or kind (both of which I feel characterize Tommi). Lunn would be a natural person to try to break the rod with Tommi, and we could Help each other, but it would put Lunn in the blast radius I am imagining (as I described in a subsequent post, 3531). Let's discuss. [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
(OOC) Scourge of Daggerford (Full)
Top