Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="wingsandsword" data-source="post: 3310990" data-attributes="member: 14159">The problem with just calling it "King's judgment" here with what she did was, she pronounced it on the King herself.Saying a Paladin might have some right to pronounce sentence on a petty thief he witnesses pickpocketing, or upon a brigand who tries to rob him on the trail is one thing, to confront her sovereign in his throne room, accuse him openly of treason, ignore the calls of a fellow paladin to detain him for trial, then pronounce her sworn lord guilty of said treason, and strike him down as he sits on the throne she previously bowed before, unarmed and protesting his innocence . . .is completely different.</blockquote>