Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Open Interpretation Inspirational Healing Compromise.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 6725046" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Don't want to touch the "terrible" thing with a ten-foot pole (that way lies madness and/or infractions, guys), but the "hundreds of classes" thing is...pretty much completely bogus. If you lump subclasses together with their "base" class, 4e had 25 distinct classes by the end of its run. It had a further 20 forked-off subclasses that were different from, but still fundamentally related to, one or another of those base classes. (Most classes had no subclasses at all, and of those that did, each only got 1 or 2 new variations, with the exception of the Wizard, who got <em>four</em> for no adequately explained reason.)</p><p></p><p>You could technically assert that "hybrid" as a whole counts as another class type, but that feels a bit rhetorically dodgy to me (we don't consider "multiclass" to be a starkly distinct class in other editions, and "hybrid" characters are very nearly equivalent to the old 2e multiclass rules, so...)</p><p></p><p>25 classes with a total of 45 subclasses (many classes having only one option, "itself," as a subclass) doesn't seem that bad. Particularly when 5e launched with half as many classes and 2/3 as many subclasses as it is, and will be gaining more with time (at the very least the "psion"/Mystic/whatever, several subclasses from SCAG and/or UA, and potentially PrCs as well). Since people have frequently argued that we shouldn't judge 5e harshly for not being as complete as 4e was at the end of its official run, it seems to me that things should swing both ways and we shouldn't blame 4e for being more bloated than 5e since the latter hasn't had the <em>time</em> to bloat up. Accounting for the slower release cycle of 5e, at a comparable time in 4e's history there were something like 16-18 classes (none of which even had a concept of a "subclass" yet), depending on what the timing was for the Eberron and FR books (which gave us the artificer and swordmage, respectively, IIRC).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 6725046, member: 6790260"] Don't want to touch the "terrible" thing with a ten-foot pole (that way lies madness and/or infractions, guys), but the "hundreds of classes" thing is...pretty much completely bogus. If you lump subclasses together with their "base" class, 4e had 25 distinct classes by the end of its run. It had a further 20 forked-off subclasses that were different from, but still fundamentally related to, one or another of those base classes. (Most classes had no subclasses at all, and of those that did, each only got 1 or 2 new variations, with the exception of the Wizard, who got [I]four[/I] for no adequately explained reason.) You could technically assert that "hybrid" as a whole counts as another class type, but that feels a bit rhetorically dodgy to me (we don't consider "multiclass" to be a starkly distinct class in other editions, and "hybrid" characters are very nearly equivalent to the old 2e multiclass rules, so...) 25 classes with a total of 45 subclasses (many classes having only one option, "itself," as a subclass) doesn't seem that bad. Particularly when 5e launched with half as many classes and 2/3 as many subclasses as it is, and will be gaining more with time (at the very least the "psion"/Mystic/whatever, several subclasses from SCAG and/or UA, and potentially PrCs as well). Since people have frequently argued that we shouldn't judge 5e harshly for not being as complete as 4e was at the end of its official run, it seems to me that things should swing both ways and we shouldn't blame 4e for being more bloated than 5e since the latter hasn't had the [I]time[/I] to bloat up. Accounting for the slower release cycle of 5e, at a comparable time in 4e's history there were something like 16-18 classes (none of which even had a concept of a "subclass" yet), depending on what the timing was for the Eberron and FR books (which gave us the artificer and swordmage, respectively, IIRC). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Open Interpretation Inspirational Healing Compromise.
Top