Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 6726952" data-attributes="member: 59506">I have not said that.  I think you're either confusing me with someone else, or not fully comprehending what I've communicated.One person is not most; and not all players are Warlord fans.  Maybe your friend is - I can't possibly know - but of those here at ENWorld throughout the multiple Warlord threads, those that have identified themselves as Warlord fans, the majority of them do not believe a Warlord is buildable with 5E's rules as is.As part of the project going on in the Warlording the fighter thread, I have been compiling all the feedback I can from across all of the recent Warlord threads.  That feedback shows that Warlord fans here at ENWorld do not agree with the claim you just made.Since those posts are open for anyone to read, you're quite able to read and compile them for yourself if you don't believe me.  Other than that, when I'm done making the betas for the Warlording the Fighter thread, I will attach the compiled feedback.Really?  I didn't realize you were such an expert on internal WotC thinking or the RPG Industry in general that you can so confidently declare what will happen in the game's future.I am truly impressed.  I'd love to hear your expert opinion - backed with facts of course - explaining all of this to us.  I - and probably most everybody else reading these threads - would find it fascinating.First of all, I haven't started these threads.  I have started exactly one thread.  I have however, posted in many of these threads, but nowhere have I sought the blessing of anyone other than those who self-identify as Warlord Fans.Second, I am almost exclusively a DM, not a player.  I have been searching for someone to join our group that is both able and willing to DM also, so I can have the chance to play, but that hasn't happened yet.  The last time I played in a group, as opposed to DM'd a group, was about 9 years ago (just before I retired from the Air Force).Third and last, you have made it very clear that you are not a Warlord Fan.  That's fine; but it also means that as concerns the Warlord, your opinion about it means next to nothing to me.  That's not intended as an insult, it's just a statement of fact.  As such, the only interest I have in discussing this topic with non-Warlord fans is to counter misconceptions/misunderstandings, point out faulty logic, and perhaps change a few minds along the way.  That's it.I am most certainly not seeking your Blessing, and it would be essentially meaningless to me even if you offered one.Sorry to break this to you, but No.  You do not possess the prerogative to tell Warlord fans what they should or should not do.  If you have a problem with what Warlord fans want, that's simply tough.  You have no more right to tell others what to do as others have the right to tell you what to do.Wow.  I didn't realize that your opinions and preferences - your experiences - were so universal.  Silly me.  All this time I thought I had my own opinions and preferences, when what I should have been doing is asking you what I should and shouldn't care about.I lament all those wasted years...<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm    :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></blockquote>

Verification