Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Open Interpretation Inspirational Healing Compromise.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FormerlyHemlock" data-source="post: 6728354" data-attributes="member: 6787650"><p>I'm not 100% sure about the statement in bold. It might be true in the same vacuous sense that makes it possible for AD&D 2nd edition to handle lightsabers and CoC-style Sanity loss, through extensive houseruling--but houserules of that magnitude generally don't borrow much from their base systems.</p><p></p><p>When considering what aspects of AD&D don't fit into 5E, I'd look primarily at data that simply isn't available any more. That could mean missing monster statistics like "Organization" and "Morale", it could mean whole missing rule systems like Charisma-based Reaction Rolls at the start of every encounter, or it could mean missing mechanics like class-based XP awards (thieves getting 6 XP per gold piece of treasure found) or spells that scale with level or magic resistance.</p><p></p><p>There are some AD&D-era mechanics that I think could be ported into 5E, but I would not make the claim that it can handle "anything" from that edition, because by the time you finished house-ruling 5E into AD&D shape, you'd be playing a hybrid abomination that compromised the design integrity of 5E and probably would be less fun than just playing AD&D or 5E by itself. You have to take 5E as what it is, I think. For example, much as I love 90% Magic Resistant Mind Flayers, much as I "hanker" for them, I haven't made up my mind to houserule it into existence because it's so far from the 5E idiom that I am doubtful 5E can handle it[1]. Other things like spells that scale with level are even further from the 5E idiom and simply don't belong.</p><p></p><p></p><p>[1] I think the 5E way of simulating Magic Resistance would be for me to: give disadvantage to magic attacks, and give advantage on saving throws (which 5E already does), and give them the Avoidance feature that Demiliches have. For highly-resistant creatures such as Mind Flayers it might be appropriate to also give an AC bonus and a saving throw bonus against magic attacks, no more than +4. Or how about, "The Mind Flayer can expend its reaction to add its profiency bonus to its AC or saving throw against a magical effect. It must do this after it sees the die roll but before the effect is resolved." Kind of like Defensive Duelist for Magic, and it winds up serving the desired function of making Mind Flayers fairly impervious to bog-standard Fireballs, although you might or might not want to do something about Magic Missiles.</p><p></p><p>It might be appropriate to apply this logic to dragons as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FormerlyHemlock, post: 6728354, member: 6787650"] I'm not 100% sure about the statement in bold. It might be true in the same vacuous sense that makes it possible for AD&D 2nd edition to handle lightsabers and CoC-style Sanity loss, through extensive houseruling--but houserules of that magnitude generally don't borrow much from their base systems. When considering what aspects of AD&D don't fit into 5E, I'd look primarily at data that simply isn't available any more. That could mean missing monster statistics like "Organization" and "Morale", it could mean whole missing rule systems like Charisma-based Reaction Rolls at the start of every encounter, or it could mean missing mechanics like class-based XP awards (thieves getting 6 XP per gold piece of treasure found) or spells that scale with level or magic resistance. There are some AD&D-era mechanics that I think could be ported into 5E, but I would not make the claim that it can handle "anything" from that edition, because by the time you finished house-ruling 5E into AD&D shape, you'd be playing a hybrid abomination that compromised the design integrity of 5E and probably would be less fun than just playing AD&D or 5E by itself. You have to take 5E as what it is, I think. For example, much as I love 90% Magic Resistant Mind Flayers, much as I "hanker" for them, I haven't made up my mind to houserule it into existence because it's so far from the 5E idiom that I am doubtful 5E can handle it[1]. Other things like spells that scale with level are even further from the 5E idiom and simply don't belong. [1] I think the 5E way of simulating Magic Resistance would be for me to: give disadvantage to magic attacks, and give advantage on saving throws (which 5E already does), and give them the Avoidance feature that Demiliches have. For highly-resistant creatures such as Mind Flayers it might be appropriate to also give an AC bonus and a saving throw bonus against magic attacks, no more than +4. Or how about, "The Mind Flayer can expend its reaction to add its profiency bonus to its AC or saving throw against a magical effect. It must do this after it sees the die roll but before the effect is resolved." Kind of like Defensive Duelist for Magic, and it winds up serving the desired function of making Mind Flayers fairly impervious to bog-standard Fireballs, although you might or might not want to do something about Magic Missiles. It might be appropriate to apply this logic to dragons as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Open Interpretation Inspirational Healing Compromise.
Top