Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 4624657" data-attributes="member: 2525">The "placed on notice" is the document itself I think.  The judge is not referring to any other kind of notice that I am aware of.  It's not actual notice, from what I know, it's just constructive notice (had they read everything and insisted on seeing the exercised option, like they should have, they would have known).  Gordon was claiming to WB at the time that he owned all the rights I think, and WB chose to simply believe that.I really do not think that is what happened.  The judge never details any such conversation.  I think he is referring to the document itself.They could not.  The quit-claim option was in Gordan's name, personally.  And the option could not be transferred.  Gordan needed to exercise it, and did not, but I think he was representing to WB that he owned all the rights.</blockquote>