Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kelleris" data-source="post: 1813099" data-attributes="member: 19130">Gah!  Sorry for the no-showage.  Between these server problems and RL stuff, I've been swamped.Enough complaining, on with business and pleasure!   <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Ashy: are you planning on making a character or simply waiting on standby in case we need someone?  If you do make a character, I'm inclined to give you an equal shot with the others, and just roll randomly for my starting group if I decide the number I get is too many.  Actually making a character is the painful part, after all.Ferrix: technically, yes, Weapon Focus would work with style-oriented.  However, it probably shouldn't, as that makes the mw component too powerful compared to balanced and way too powerful compared to a natural +2 weapon.  The idea is that it's something that you have to choose to use (Power Attack, say) or something you have no direct control over (Mad Hatter's weapon is style-oriented for antimagic areas).  For a professional thief, how about having it work against your Dodge target, or against someone denied their Dex bonus to AC?Argent Silvermage: You've already worked on your character for some time.  Until someone else comes up with a finished sheet, that pretty much guarantees you a place on the short list.  Truthfully, it'll be hard to pick a group, but I don't want anyone simply bowing out unless they're honestly ambivalent about the game I propose.  I'll try to come up with something, and if worst comes to worst I may simply take Ashy's advice and establish a semi-rigid hierarchy to keep things relatively orderly.</blockquote>

Verification