Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Opening can o' worms
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 3029060" data-attributes="member: 172"><p>I do not see where this hypothetical conflict of interest you are suggesting arises. How does being a staff reviewer influence my opinion on products judge in the ennies? I am not seeing it.</p><p></p><p>I mean seriously. This is a topic that comes up all the time in my line of work, and we receive training on it regularly. We are taught to avoid things like having a government employee preside on a panel that will be judging on whether to buy a product produced by a company your wife works for. That's appearance of conflict of interest.</p><p></p><p>But you have presented no credible scenario here over which we should be concerned that I see.</p><p></p><p>You poo-poo me above, but I am not seeing how what you were saying there is any different than what you were saying earlier:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, by virtue of having made judgements on the quality of products, we are ineligible to make judgements on the quality of products? Because a publisher does not like the judgements we make, we should be barred from the committee? That's not preventing a conflict of interest, that's inviting one by allowing publishers to dictate who we put on the committe by objecting to them.</p><p></p><p>If a publisher or publishing segment is not represented, and the fans feel it is not represented, there is a mechanism for dealing with that: vote for someone who represents your standpoint. That is, arguably, why Diaglo took a seat this year. That is the principle on which a public nomination is founded.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Psion, post: 3029060, member: 172"] I do not see where this hypothetical conflict of interest you are suggesting arises. How does being a staff reviewer influence my opinion on products judge in the ennies? I am not seeing it. I mean seriously. This is a topic that comes up all the time in my line of work, and we receive training on it regularly. We are taught to avoid things like having a government employee preside on a panel that will be judging on whether to buy a product produced by a company your wife works for. That's appearance of conflict of interest. But you have presented no credible scenario here over which we should be concerned that I see. You poo-poo me above, but I am not seeing how what you were saying there is any different than what you were saying earlier: So, by virtue of having made judgements on the quality of products, we are ineligible to make judgements on the quality of products? Because a publisher does not like the judgements we make, we should be barred from the committee? That's not preventing a conflict of interest, that's inviting one by allowing publishers to dictate who we put on the committe by objecting to them. If a publisher or publishing segment is not represented, and the fans feel it is not represented, there is a mechanism for dealing with that: vote for someone who represents your standpoint. That is, arguably, why Diaglo took a seat this year. That is the principle on which a public nomination is founded. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Opening can o' worms
Top