Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Opinion: better or worse encounter format?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="N'raac" data-source="post: 5728471" data-attributes="member: 6681948"><p>OK, I'm at a bit of a disadvantage in not reading the spoilers as I plan on playing in Zeitgeist. My view probably parallels Cheezmo's - we all play by the same rules. Unusual creatures/monsters sometimes get abilities that PC's don't have access to, and that might even extend to some very special NPC's (likely ones that have somehow gone beyond the "Mere Mortal PC Race).</p><p></p><p>If it takes a four feat chain for a PC to accomplish a specific result, the NPC should not be granted extra feats nor given a "special feat" to accomplish it. But, with that said, I see a few options for adding unusual abilities:</p><p></p><p> - perhaps this is a variant class archetype, so the character gives up some abilities he would normally have to gain access to other abilities. Especially for one off encounters, the NPC may have an array of class features that aren't as useful in the role he plays in the scenario, and can give up a lot of abilities a player would be reluctant to sacrifice in order to gain the abilities specially suited to this encounter. I wouldn't want to see a ton of this, but the GM gets the out to indicate, say, "Yeah, your rogue could do that too if he sacrificed 6 skill points per level and the ability to use Sneak Attack in melee to take this archetype". A racial variant could also work.</p><p></p><p> - more relevant at higher levels, maybe it's a prestige class (and one that's hard to qualify for), similarly sacrificing some class abilities for others.</p><p></p><p>- maybe it has some unsavoury requirements. There's a witch hex in Ultimate Magic that has some very powerful effects, but requires cooking and eating an intelligent creature, cited as "always an evil act". Maybe a special ability of a Fey servant, or a specific PRC, requires swearing absolute loyalty to the Fey, or slows your learning process so you only gain half the xp of your teammates/only advance in level half as quickly (OK, that one is extreme enough to be the same as saying "no PC may take this ability").</p><p></p><p> -maybe it's a new feat (or even chain). Third party publishers can publish these, I believe. </p><p></p><p> - Perhaps any of these could be tagged as being unique to the Zeitgeist setting (sure, GM's can still allow them to be 'ported, but it's not mandatory).</p><p></p><p> - maybe the ability comes from a Theme Feat not available to Risurians. Do all major NPC's have, and use, a Zeitgeist Theme feat at present?</p><p></p><p>I'd avoid going hog wild with this - to paraphrase Cheezmo in a less politically sensitive manner, if we wanted to play 4e, most of us would play 4e. We're playing Pathfinder.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="N'raac, post: 5728471, member: 6681948"] OK, I'm at a bit of a disadvantage in not reading the spoilers as I plan on playing in Zeitgeist. My view probably parallels Cheezmo's - we all play by the same rules. Unusual creatures/monsters sometimes get abilities that PC's don't have access to, and that might even extend to some very special NPC's (likely ones that have somehow gone beyond the "Mere Mortal PC Race). If it takes a four feat chain for a PC to accomplish a specific result, the NPC should not be granted extra feats nor given a "special feat" to accomplish it. But, with that said, I see a few options for adding unusual abilities: - perhaps this is a variant class archetype, so the character gives up some abilities he would normally have to gain access to other abilities. Especially for one off encounters, the NPC may have an array of class features that aren't as useful in the role he plays in the scenario, and can give up a lot of abilities a player would be reluctant to sacrifice in order to gain the abilities specially suited to this encounter. I wouldn't want to see a ton of this, but the GM gets the out to indicate, say, "Yeah, your rogue could do that too if he sacrificed 6 skill points per level and the ability to use Sneak Attack in melee to take this archetype". A racial variant could also work. - more relevant at higher levels, maybe it's a prestige class (and one that's hard to qualify for), similarly sacrificing some class abilities for others. - maybe it has some unsavoury requirements. There's a witch hex in Ultimate Magic that has some very powerful effects, but requires cooking and eating an intelligent creature, cited as "always an evil act". Maybe a special ability of a Fey servant, or a specific PRC, requires swearing absolute loyalty to the Fey, or slows your learning process so you only gain half the xp of your teammates/only advance in level half as quickly (OK, that one is extreme enough to be the same as saying "no PC may take this ability"). -maybe it's a new feat (or even chain). Third party publishers can publish these, I believe. - Perhaps any of these could be tagged as being unique to the Zeitgeist setting (sure, GM's can still allow them to be 'ported, but it's not mandatory). - maybe the ability comes from a Theme Feat not available to Risurians. Do all major NPC's have, and use, a Zeitgeist Theme feat at present? I'd avoid going hog wild with this - to paraphrase Cheezmo in a less politically sensitive manner, if we wanted to play 4e, most of us would play 4e. We're playing Pathfinder. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Opinion: better or worse encounter format?
Top