Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions need on spell use
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Plane Sailing" data-source="post: 254000" data-attributes="member: 114"><p>Personally? I would nix the "9 persons" line and just say that when the caster leaves it vanishes, but others can come and go as they see fit, including those outside.</p><p></p><p>The idea that only up to 9 people can enter and it hedges out more than that seems bizarre. Why would a wizard create a spell with such strange limitations? Why not create it so that nobody other than the caster can get in? We already know that there is nothing to stop missiles and other material objects passing through the sphere, so why should living creatures be hedged out, especially since the spell never specifically mentions this (and I think it would if they had any intention of it!).</p><p></p><p>I don't think you should try to read more into a spell than it states - after all, that is where all the "aha, I'll slice them with my edge-on wall of force spell" ideas come from <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Simply as stated it the spell has the useful property of providing total concealment to your archers, while allowing them free reign when shooting. This is a super benefit on top of the normal basic use of the spell for a secure and comfortable camp-site.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Plane Sailing, post: 254000, member: 114"] Personally? I would nix the "9 persons" line and just say that when the caster leaves it vanishes, but others can come and go as they see fit, including those outside. The idea that only up to 9 people can enter and it hedges out more than that seems bizarre. Why would a wizard create a spell with such strange limitations? Why not create it so that nobody other than the caster can get in? We already know that there is nothing to stop missiles and other material objects passing through the sphere, so why should living creatures be hedged out, especially since the spell never specifically mentions this (and I think it would if they had any intention of it!). I don't think you should try to read more into a spell than it states - after all, that is where all the "aha, I'll slice them with my edge-on wall of force spell" ideas come from :) Simply as stated it the spell has the useful property of providing total concealment to your archers, while allowing them free reign when shooting. This is a super benefit on top of the normal basic use of the spell for a secure and comfortable camp-site. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions need on spell use
Top