Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions on "Does Format Matter"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dungeoneer" data-source="post: 5474452" data-attributes="member: 91777"><p>I think the guy who wrote the article is on to something (although I think the poll misses the point - it's about people's <em>perceptions</em> of the stat blocks, not how useful they are or aren't). I have a saying: "Presentation counts." I generally use this in the context of the IT field which I work in, but it applies pretty well to life in general. Humans respond very viscerally to the look and feel of something. They say you can't judge a book by its cover, but the fact is that everybody does. We just can't help it.</p><p></p><p>I would guess that if 4e had been given a more 'classic' look at the get-go and perhaps started with more 'Essentialized' classes that it would have been more widely accepted by the community, at least at first.</p><p></p><p>That said, I think that at this point most of the people who were initially turned off by the 'look and feel' of 4e have probably given it a fair shake. In the long run I don't know that what the game looked like will matter much. But in the short run it probably did quite a bit.</p><p></p><p>...</p><p></p><p>On a side note, people are constantly knocking the 4e artists, and I don't think that's quite fair. Artists on this kind of thing aren't free to just draw any old way they like. There is such a thing as 'art direction', and the 4e artists have to follow theirs. You could have Michelangelo working at WotC, but if he wanted to keep his job he'd better match the guidelines handed down by management.</p><p></p><p>The art direction in 4e is obviously intended to attract young readers without seeming too 'kiddie' for adults*. Does it succeed? Meh. <em>Some</em>times. </p><p></p><p>The artwork in 4e isn't always my cup of tea, but the blame needs to be laid at the feet of the art direction, not the individual artists. I'm sure WotC can afford the best, and gets them. It's just too bad they then shackle them with these oddly shaped, vaguely cartoonish characters.</p><p></p><p>* I'm just happy they didn't go with an anime look.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dungeoneer, post: 5474452, member: 91777"] I think the guy who wrote the article is on to something (although I think the poll misses the point - it's about people's [I]perceptions[/I] of the stat blocks, not how useful they are or aren't). I have a saying: "Presentation counts." I generally use this in the context of the IT field which I work in, but it applies pretty well to life in general. Humans respond very viscerally to the look and feel of something. They say you can't judge a book by its cover, but the fact is that everybody does. We just can't help it. I would guess that if 4e had been given a more 'classic' look at the get-go and perhaps started with more 'Essentialized' classes that it would have been more widely accepted by the community, at least at first. That said, I think that at this point most of the people who were initially turned off by the 'look and feel' of 4e have probably given it a fair shake. In the long run I don't know that what the game looked like will matter much. But in the short run it probably did quite a bit. ... On a side note, people are constantly knocking the 4e artists, and I don't think that's quite fair. Artists on this kind of thing aren't free to just draw any old way they like. There is such a thing as 'art direction', and the 4e artists have to follow theirs. You could have Michelangelo working at WotC, but if he wanted to keep his job he'd better match the guidelines handed down by management. The art direction in 4e is obviously intended to attract young readers without seeming too 'kiddie' for adults*. Does it succeed? Meh. [I]Some[/I]times. The artwork in 4e isn't always my cup of tea, but the blame needs to be laid at the feet of the art direction, not the individual artists. I'm sure WotC can afford the best, and gets them. It's just too bad they then shackle them with these oddly shaped, vaguely cartoonish characters. * I'm just happy they didn't go with an anime look. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions on "Does Format Matter"
Top